User talk:Ben Ben/Archive 3

WPCleaner 2.0
--NicoV (Talk on frwiki) 14:48, 1 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Hello Nico, thank you for the message. I saw another user working with V2.0 yesterday and have already changed to it. -- Ben Ben (talk) 21:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Question
Hi Ben Ben, I do have a questions for you regarding an article found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_remote_desktop_software please do message me at amirmarip@yahoo.com. Thank you!AmirPasc (talk) 13:45, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, you seem to have a lot of questions for a bunch of users. Feel free to ask your questions on the articles discussion page. -- Ben Ben (talk) 19:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Spam
Dear Ben Ben, I see you do not understand the plants and are unfamiliar with the subject. You rate work as spam which I help readers of Wikipedia. I put out the best links on the subject if others haven’t been willing for years. You neither. It's easy to delete other people's work and call it spam. You haven't checked, you're doing a bad job, you're not thorough. You are superficial. Show me more detailed than my plant descriptions. You can not. Is it better now that there are blank pages in many places? Help me rather than destroy you. Rest assured, I will no longer expose anything to wikipedia anymore because it is professionally weak ... Best regards, TKovacsT — Preceding unsigned comment added by T.KovacsT (talk • contribs) 21:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)


 *  I put out the best links on the subject ... and that is 188 times a link to your commercial web page? No WP:LINKSPAM. -- Ben Ben (talk) 21:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear Ben Ben,
 * Yes, because there is nothing better for him in the subject. The links are not to the commercial page, but to the encyclopedia. Whoever is asking for a donation to make it work is a non-commercial site? But that is it. Support and pay for the information.... that is, you sell... And I have nothing to do with the other links. Why were those links deleted? At least they would have left them. Show better links than these 4 pages. Come on, don't hold back. Or isn’t the goal to get readers the best information on Wikipedia? There are 600 species of conifers, of which at least 300 species have no information on Wikipedia. 188 is nothing if we look at 10 languages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by T.KovacsT (talk • contribs) 16:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, because there is nothing better for him in the subject. The links are not to the commercial page, but to the encyclopedia. Whoever is asking for a donation to make it work is a non-commercial site? But that is it. Support and pay for the information.... that is, you sell... And I have nothing to do with the other links. Why were those links deleted? At least they would have left them. Show better links than these 4 pages. Come on, don't hold back. Or isn’t the goal to get readers the best information on Wikipedia? There are 600 species of conifers, of which at least 300 species have no information on Wikipedia. 188 is nothing if we look at 10 languages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by T.KovacsT (talk • contribs) 16:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

The notability guideline doesn't govern the content of articles, including embedded lists
You recently reverted another editor's addition of material to an article using the edit summary "Please read WP:N." Presumably you were trying to tell the editor that you removed their addition because that material is not notable. Please don't do that as the guideline is very explicit that it "does not determine the content of articles, but only whether the topic may have its own article." There may be some other very good reasons to remove that material but notability is not among them. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 23:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)