User talk:Ben hamburger

Speedy deletion of Samantha Grant
A tag has been placed on Samantha Grant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 10:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 10:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|32px|left]] You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this page without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the page's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review.  JuJube (talk) 10:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Marasmusine (talk) 11:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

24 hour block
Because you again created the same page, you have now been blocked for 24 hours. If you continue in the same vein upon your return, your block will both come swifter and be longer. Wikipedia is not a free webhost but an encyclopedia. Fram (talk) 11:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your |talk page by adding the text. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org.


 * To explain: this account was created on 12:44 today, and from 12:50 to 13:03 (i.e. until you were blocked) it has only been used to repeatedly re-create an unencyclopedic article about a girl named Samantha Grant. If I were to believe that somebody else was using your account, it would have meant that you can't keep it secure for mere minutes. Please see our notability guidelines if you want to know what topics are generally considered appropriate for an encyclopedic article. On the other hand, the policy allows for a reasonable amount of personal information to be included in user pages of active contributors (in your case, User:Ben hamburger), but please note that Wikipedia is not a personal website provider. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)