User talk:Benaron

The Kiruv Organisation page is constantly censored by supporters of the page who refuse to accept documented issues with the organisation! (Editor since June 2006 with several edits of other pages - AW).

Kiruv Organisation
Hi,

I notice your account seems to be a relative new joiner (Feb 2014) to Wikipedia editing, and is quickly involved in an editorial dispute about the Kiruv Organisation.

I ask you to read very carefully, our page on edit warring at Edit warring and take note. It's not a complicated page. It basically says, however strongly you feel, however right you might be, or others might be, Wikipedia disagreements are resolved by dialog and focussing on evidence from reliable sources, not hearsay, and not ignoring each other totally.

We do have strong rules on editor conduct; if you feel other editors break those, please feel free to ask at our administrators board, if it becomes impossible or someone simply refuses to act rerasonably. Right now, I haven't looked much at this argument, beyond noticing it has attracted a few people who don't know how Wikipedia disputes work, and may not know that people can be blocked for "fighting" or just undoing each others attempts constantly, when they should be talking about problems in an article to find a "best way to represent what is documented".

I have posted a copy of this to several other less experienced editors, or apparent newcomers, in the same dispute, so this isn't about "you" so much as just making sure you all know what the rules are and how to ask for help!

Bottom line - engage in actual "talk page" dialog if there is a disagreement on an article's handling of some matter (via the "discuss" or "talk" tab at the top of that article)..... on Wikipedia, the people who behave well, tend to endure better than the ones who disrupt. It's designed that way. If that's not working, ask for administrator help.

FT2 (Talk 13:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gwynnethand Pyrtyr


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Gwynnethand Pyrtyr, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)