User talk:Bencherlite/Archive 11

DYK for Cwyllog
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Cantatas
Thank you for the barnstar! My birthday resolution: a Bach cantata on DYK each Sunday. Worked three times (well, the last one appeared on Saturday). Please remind me of the project if I get tired, smile, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

RFPP
Hi! I just wanted to let you know that we crossed paths commenting on at RFPP. I've left my two cents there, but would understand if you think the protection should be lifted. TN X Man 20:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Izzy Westbury et al...
Your comment (about the Oxford Union) got me thinking somewhat. Should Izzy Westbury, and any other cricketer or person that has attended Oxford at all have a tag for WP:OXFORD?  Harrias  talk 20:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I'll stick her on with low priority anyway.  Have nommed the article for GA, so hopefully you shouldn't have to worry too much about improving it!  Harrias  talk  21:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

"Template"
A template is a navigational bar that usually sits at the bottom of a page. However, the very fundamentals of it has been taken by many editors in order to facilitate page editing and updating as well as other uses. My case is such one. Jamen Somasu (talk) 21:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
For the repair to my talk page. I couldn't figure out why that barnstar was doing that, so I was adopting the strategy of "ignore it, and maybe it will go away." And, hey! My strategy worked! -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Elaeth
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 18:02, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for St Eleth's Church, Amlwch
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 18:02, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Very much liking your work on Anglesey churches. Good to see you using the locator map of Anglesey I made too! Dr. Blofeld       White cat 18:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Are you from Anglesey? I'm living in Wales but the otherside in the Vale of Glamorgan! Dr. Blofeld       White cat 18:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Luggage, always a pain in the arse!! Hey if you ever need any extra photos for your articles try geograph.Like photos of the beach at Penmon etc... Check out these free photos of Penmon Beach! Keep up the good work! Dr. Blofeld       White cat 18:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Eglwys St Eleth Church.jpg. Ahah so I see! Why on earth they entirety of geograph isn't uploaded to the commons beats me. There was something said about too many pictures of non notable green fields and farms and the small px size or something but they are still large enough to be encyclopedic I think....  Dr. Blofeld       White cat 19:01, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I was wondering if you could find something to write about the village of Dulas, Anglesey? We have Dulas Bay but little on the actual village! Dr. Blofeld       White cat 10:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Our Lady Star of the Sea and St Winefride, Amlwch
Courcelles (talk) 06:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Hey there, Bencherlite, hope you are doing well. ;) Thank you for closing the WP:FPOC on Portal:Canada after it was withdrawn. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 16:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

List of presidents of Washington & Jefferson College
Thanks for your good comments at the FLC for List of presidents of Washington & Jefferson College. Much appreciated!--GrapedApe (talk) 18:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Symphony in White
Hi, I've gone over Symphony in White, No. 1: The White Girl after your review. Please have another look when you can. Lampman (talk) 00:56, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your reviews and copy-editing of all three articles. Lampman (talk) 15:47, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of St Pabo's Church, Llanbabo
The article St Pabo's Church, Llanbabo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:St Pabo's Church, Llanbabo for eventual comments about the article. Well done! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:01, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of St Peulan's Church, Llanbeulan
The article St Peulan's Church, Llanbeulan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:St Peulan's Church, Llanbeulan for eventual comments about the article. Well done! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:47, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

GA articles
Great work Bencherlite. FruitMonkey (talk) 21:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Excellent work" Hopefully the whole series on Anglesey churches will reach GA! Dr. Blofeld       White cat 09:55, 12 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, folks. Two down, three more waiting to be reviewed, lots more waiting to be written! BencherliteTalk 09:58, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

why?
1. Why did you speedily delete the jail category?

2. Why did you not wait for the normal length of time? What was the urgency to do so?

3. Why did you not comment on the reasons for speedily delete?

4. Why is there no consideration for the purpose of categories and how this category fulfills the purpose. Both other editors and the help desk agree that categories help users find related articles.

5. Why is there no consideration for new rationale that was never discussed in earlier discussions (at least the links provided by one user). Previous debates were along the lines of "I like it" versus "I don't like it". "Tabloid" versus "not tabloid". Nobody ever discussed the usefulness of categories.

6. Why will you not reopen the discussion for it to go on at the normal speed instead of closing it speedily?

Thank you. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 16:25, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not misunderstand. I am not calling you an idiot, a dictator, a Nazi, or anything like that. I only thought that there was the normal gut reaction to delete (which I agree) but that there are deeper philosophical reasons to keep (which might be a reason for keep). In short, I am still undecided. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 16:28, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind message, in particular, your explanation of categories. I did not know of that link to the WP:CAT. Meow. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 15:14, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

AFD?
This is unrelated to any AFD you participated in.

If an AFD is a "delete" decision, what if nobody deletes it? After a certain time period, does that mean a keep? For example, after 1 month or 1 year or 1 decade, it is a keep?

Or, after a few weeks of not being deleted, can anyone blank the page without getting a warning or block? (Sort of a Wikipedia sanctioned vandalism)?

Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 17:42, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Centering at the Cheshire Portal
Thanks a lot for this, Bencherlite (and for spotting the original glitch) -- it's slightly spacier than it was but now seems to be centred in both Firefox & IE 6. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I fear my English teacher would have beaten me too! I'm still working on some of your other points... I'm not entirely happy with the effect of trying to make all the anniversaries into clear fragments: some of the re-formulations are very clumsy, some information just won't fit, and I don't like the strings of "Birth of..." that have been generated. I'm tempted to revert and try to make them all into (semi-)complete sentences with a full stop -- what would you think to putting a full stop after a sentence in which the "was" had been elided, eg "John Smith born in Chester." or "Foundation stone of Chester Abbey laid." ?


 * By the way, did you ever consider putting forward your Oxford portal for featured? I recall it appearing at peer review and being so well constructed that my only comment was along the lines of "could you do one for Cambridge, too?". Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The image alignment seems a problem -- the fix you suggested is definitely better in Firefox -- it doesn't give perfect alignment but it does seem to give a larger margin at the top so it's less obvious that it's not aligned perfectly -- but it seems considerably worse in IE 6. The edit you made to the intro makes the alignment worse in Firefox -- I think the randomised image is confusing things. Unfortunately my net connection has been going up and down every minute or so for several hours now, which is very frustrating.


 * For some reason, the Oxford content appears far more developed than the Cambridge, which (it has to be admitted) is rather rubbish. I'll have to go around sneakily deleting articles relating to Oxford academics to even it up a bit... Espresso Addict (talk) 17:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

St Cwyllog's Church, Llangwyllog GA nomination
Hi, I've reviewed St Cwyllog's Church, Llangwyllog against the GA criteria, and it easily passed. I've left one comment at the review page. Good work!-- Beloved Freak  11:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Notability of buildings
Hi, given your current project, I thought you might be able to answer this. I've not done much work on buildings myself, but am interested in putting together a list of listed buildings. Do you know if being a listed building in England & Wales makes a building notable enough for an article, or if it would still have to meet GNG? Obviously, having significant coverage in RS would be preferable in order to find enough material to write about, but I was just wondering if being listed would confer any automatic notability. Thanks-- Beloved Freak  11:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks for your comment, that's kind of what I was thinking.-- Beloved Freak  13:01, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

St Iestyn's Church, Llaniestyn GA review
Hello, I've reviewed St Iestyn's Church, Llaniestyn and it's passed as a GA. Well done!-- Beloved Freak  15:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Cronulla Seagulls
Hi Bencherlite. Thanks for your help on the Cronulla Seagulls page. Did you go to Jesus College? I'm a Pembroke man myself... Have you any idea how I can get the soccer kit gizmo to work? It's just coming up as blank white for me. I also take your point about notability. I have found one good external source - an article in the Sydney Morning Herald (http://www.smh.com.au/world-cup-2010/world-cup-news/pulled-up-by-the-grassroots-20100604-xkjo.html) that talks about the Sutherland Shire Football Association in general. Is there a way I can upload it so that it stays there permanently, even if the SMH move or delete it? I've seen some 'Retrieved On' rubric next to inernet links before. Any hekp or advice would be gratefully received. Cheers, Nick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick palmer69 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Wadham man here (1979) - allow me to interject while the UK folks are asleep. The best way to deal with the reference is to use the Cite news template, which for the reference above would look like:


 * In the references section it will render as:


 * – ukexpat (talk) 01:36, 21 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Oops I see Bencherlite already responded on your talk page.... – ukexpat (talk) 01:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Closure of Odd behaviour from OhanaUnited
Hi Bencherlite. Note that your closure statement appears to be inaccurate considering User:Crossmr's arguments. --Elekhh (talk) 00:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the prompt explanation. Does this mean that I will have to live with the subject threat by an admin of blocking me, or would you suggest moving the discussion to another forum? --Elekhh (talk) 00:52, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

The real issue which was obviously missed here was that there is in fact an on-going (albeit slow) pattern. Even though he is an admin, he engages in a very low level of talk, and thus finds himself in very few disagreements. However of the discussion threads that I could find that were obvious disagreements (without looking at every single talk edit he has made) He made inappropriate and disruptive responses in all of them. The original claim was there was no pattern, so I showed old edits to demonstrate the pattern, then the claim was made that the diffs were old. you can't have it both ways. They were all within his last 150 talk contribs. On-going disruption with multiple editors is rarely a case for RF/C (which is a non-binding wasteland), DR, and Arbcom wouldn't touch it at this point. This was a very clear case of disruptive behaviour backed with a pattern which is the direct task of administrators to deal with.--Crossmr (talk) 08:05, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * As I pointed out, at the point of closure only 6 people had commented and it was split 50/50. This is not the time to be trying to force a discussion closed rather to let it go to its natural end. There was no clear consensus either way, and the requirement for disruptive users is that they demonstrate that they know what they did is wrong and promise not to do it again, he did neither. Any other, non-admin, user would have been blocked at that point so there was still plenty to discuss.--Crossmr (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Portal:US Roads
Hi there -- I've responded at the discussion. I'm going to have to walk away from this one, I'm afraid, as I can't see Imzadi & I ever agreeing on anything. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Ralph George Scott Bankes
Hi, You kindly added categories on my previous new pages, could you do the same for this one please? Haven't worked out how to do it yet: Ralph George Scott Bankes

Also these, if you have the time or inclination: Wilfred Griffin Eady, Ebenezer Cooke (art education reformer)

Many thanks for the Lushingtons, Acabashi (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acabashi (talk • contribs) 17:25, 23 July 2010

Friends of Friendless Churches in Wales
Hi. I fear that I might be straying into your area, and certainly into your country. Following the list Historic Chapels Trust, I have moved into work on churches preserved by the Friends of Friendless Churches. It seems that the Friends are looking after a number of churches in Wales, as well as in England. You can see how much I have done to date; on English churches here, and on Welsh churches here. I have made sure there is an article for every English church, and where there was not I have written one; they are all done. So now I am into Wales, and have written the first article, St Cynhaearn's Church, Ynyscynhaearn. This is not up to the standard of your GAs, but it is at least a start. If you want to improve this, or any article in the future, please go ahead. Before I go live with the list I shall be asking for your comments and advice, so you can give this at any time you choose. Best wishes,--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 11:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Signpost "Features and admins" column
Hi Bencherlite,

The Signpost's "Features and admins" page now includes a "Choice of the week" for featured articles, featured lists and featured pictures. Each week, The Signpost invites a different delegate, reviewer or nominator from each process to select what they think is the best, or their favourite, item, and to give their reasons. These reasons can be technical (e.g., related to the Criteria) or subjective, or both.

Would you be willing to do this with featured lists for next week’s edition? If you agree, promotions from Monday 26 July to Saturday 31 July will be eligible (only six days this week because the publication deadline has come forward). They will be listed here by Saturday UTC, and we would need your text by Sunday UTC. Examples from previous weeks are accessible by clicking on "← PREVIOUS Features and admins" at the bottom. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikinews
Don't know if you saw it, and I'm a little late notifying you here anyways (I figured you wouldn't be particularly inclined to check your WN talk page), but per your request, I removed reviewer privileges from your Wikinews account. Hope you'll consider becoming more active there again in the future, and thanks for what you've done in the past. Cheers, C628 (talk) 03:22, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

VPC
— raeky  T  00:00, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Signpost column
Hi Bencherlite, will you be around to do the choice of the week this weekend (see my my earlier post)? No worries if you won't be; I just need to know soon. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 15:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Prof/prof
Hiya! Thanks for your contribution of William Morfill to DYK! My only question is, in the hook, is the word 'Professor' supposed to be capitalized? I wasn't sure. Let me know, cheers!   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 20:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response! See User talk:Arbitrarily0.  Cheers,    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 23:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * And again! :)   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 23:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Listed buildings in Rivington/archive1
Hey Bencherlite. I hate to bother you again, but you said you were going to review this in detail. Do you still plan to do that? Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 14:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Stanley Whitehead
WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive_41

Dear Bencherlite! In March 2009 you requested on page above for a page or article about Stanley Whitehead out of the Electrical Journal. Do you remember? Is this request still open or can it be archived? (Please reply here), Greetings, Doc Taxon (talk) 16:18, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Feel free to archive; not important anymore. Thanks, BencherliteTalk 21:27, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for William Morfill
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Registrar of the University of Oxford
The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Re your recent post on BLPN
Hi, I think it might be better to post that at WP:COIN, I am also not sure that it is appropriate to state as fact that the wikipedia account is controlled by a named person. Unomi (talk) 09:40, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Historic
Here in England we say historic not istoric, so it should be a historic, not an historic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.85.135.135 (talk) 13:10, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Surely both are acceptable in British English? It's kind of a point of contention sometimes, with "an" histor% being seen as perhaps somewhat old-fashioned by some. For example, the Times style guide seems to prefer it, the Guardian's doesn't. Either way, it's not really a question of wrong or right.  N-HH   talk / edits  19:17, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Exactly; both are acceptable. However, as the version preferred by the main author and passed at FAC was "an historic", we stick with that, IMHO, by analogy with (even if not directly because of) WP:ENGVAR and WP:RETAIN. BencherliteTalk 19:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Hackney
Oooh, nice! I've gone off trusts for a bit while I write a biography on the guy who kicked off the Agricultural Revolution, but I'll certainly keep it in mind. There's relatively little to find on living academics, unfortunately, which is why whenever I edit the halls of North London regularly ring with a loud and plaintive (or plaintiff, ho-ho) "GODDAMMIT WHY WON'T YOU DO ME A FAVOUR AND JUST DIE!". Ironholds (talk) 08:47, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Excellent! I've got a couple of judicial biographies to write, including those of Rigby Swift (who once told a claimant, disapprovingly, that "this court is here to uphold the law, not 'justice'") and Henry McCardie (a High Court judge knighted and bewigged before he was even a QC, so knowledgeable that despite not even having a degree his chambers were known as "the lighthouse" for the way the lights would stay on until 4 in the morning, when he finally finished the cases he was working on). Said Mr Justice McCardie was found on Assize with his brains blown out through the back of his head, a mass of gambling debts and an illegitimate son. Ironholds (talk) 09:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

"... I might be able to squeeze a couple more out by the end of the year..."
Feel free! My real life changes have meant less time on-wiki (check my contributions) but I would never, ever, EVER miss out on an opportunity to pour scorn on your paltry offerings....! Naturally, I'll have my say, it may be a few days before I do, but rest assured, it'll be steeped in my usual ridiculous vernacular. Much obliged for the tickle though. Hope all is peachy in your Dark Blue universe. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:18, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Portal help
So I fixed the portal to what you said. Is there anything else that's worrisome or do you think I could go ahead and safely nominate it? Also, I have seen sourcing on the template of another one so I'm unsure if I should do that. Thanks again for your help. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:45, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: I took the liberty of mentioning your name...
No problem -- I'll take a look at it as soon as the peer review slot goes live. As to the others, I've just reviewed Volcanoes, which I think should pass, but I'm mystified as to why Our Esteemed FP Directors have yet to close Spec Fic & US Roads. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Brian Twyne
Just letting you know that I passed Brian Twyne as GA, and left some suggestions on the review page for you to consider. I categorized it under "History", but feel free to move it to Education if you prefer. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 17:47, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Evan Vaughan Anwyl
Hi Bencherlite. Need your help with Evan Vaughan Anwyl, please. Does the reason for deletion make sense? Seems like an opinion poll going on by a select few: "No evidence of notability by our criteria." Could you please assist with sorting out this confusion? Thanks. I'm overdue to be your WS. ~ Geaugagrrl talk 10:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Wales
I have put the Wales article forward for GA status. It just needs tweaking, and maybe a heavy-handed swipe from outside to get it in place. I am writing to those who are constant contributors and defenders of Wales and Welsh articles, to not scream at me for doing this, but to help get the article through. If we fail, we fail, there is nothing wrong with that; but Wales should be a Good Article at least and if it takes good intentioned amateurs to reach that then so be it. FruitMonkey (talk) 01:37, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

John Lawson Walton
Bencherlite, first thanks for the vote of confidence in suggesting that I stand for admin - you are not the first person to suggest it and I am thinking about it. Second, and more important, can you take a look at John Lawson Walton. The Career section is confusing to say the least: the opening sentence of that section is very unclear - my guess is that it is some kind of reference to pupillage in the 19th century; also, the description of the defamation case is unclear - Playfair appears to be the defendant but was awarded damages, so I assume there was some kind of counterclaim, but this is not mentioned. Very odd. I will watch your talk page so you can reply here. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 13:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Tweaked: I read the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography entry and the Times article cited, and made a couple of fixes. The Playfair story is quite interesting, in fact: Playfair examines plaintiff, concludes she has had a recent miscarriage, knows her husband has been away for some time, decides to tell his brother-in-law (who was plaintiff's husband's brother) that she has committed adultery. No attempt to justify the slur, but a (failed) plea of privilege.  In fact, the appeal was settled on undisclosed terms, says The Times in its law report of the appeal and in its obituary of Playfair, so the strong suspicion must be that the final sum agreed was rather less than £12,000, but we will probably never know. Regards, BencherliteTalk 20:10, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Excellent research, thanks for fixing. – ukexpat (talk) 03:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Bot deletion
I recently requested for my user page to be semi-protected due to repeated vandalism, but a bot of yours (or not) seems to be blocking my requests for semi-protection on the request page. I just want to be protected against any malicious activity going on on my user page. Daxdigital (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

John Bettesworth-Trevanion
Hi Bencherlite. Thanks for catching my mistake/misreading from the cited google book. It was the father John Bettesworth who attended Queen's College. I made the correction in the article. Cheers, --Rosiestep (talk) 00:38, 1 September 2010 (UTC) '

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Stonemason89 (talk) 22:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Any of my talk-page stalkers who want a giggle should read Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents before it gets archived. BencherliteTalk 22:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You couldn't make that stuff up... Please feel free to get your own back by taking Bishzilla's advertisement promoting new improved tinfoil to ANI. And block GWH post haste! Block 'em all! Bishonen | talk 09:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC).

Thanks for a suggestion
You made a suggestion at the Portal:Star FPoC that I saw. Someone on IRC had commented that we should set a schedule for changing the state highway marker at the time of P:USRD. Well, now it does so randomly each time the portal page is loaded, and the number in the "default" circle changes each time as well. Thanks for the inspiration.  Imzadi  1979   →  00:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Brian Twyne
The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Tagging
Thanks I appreciate the heads-up and I'll review my edits. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for dealing with that user account attacking me. Not sure where that come from at all. Shrug. Oh, well... =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks! Dabomb87 (talk) 02:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks re HD
Thanks for the response of yours to my Help Desk query. Ta. That's me sorted. Trafford09 (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

RfC on Featured List Criteria section 3b
Hello. There is currently an RfC in progress at Wikipedia talk:Featured list criteria in progress regarding Criteria 3b of the featured list criteria and whether it should be modified or eliminated. As you participated in a previous discussion regarding Criteria 3b when it was first introduced, this discussion may be of interest to you. –Grondemar 16:12, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

University Challenge
I see some dirty soap dodgers representing a felonious organisation on my screen. Versus the Scots. Who do I support??! (And I think Paxman got his intro straight from a certain FA here....) The Rambling Man (talk) 19:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm 20 minutes in and regret mentioning it. (Correct me if I'm wrong but I think my lot made it through....!) The Rambling Man (talk) 19:20, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Gah, what?! 335–35?  I believe that could be nearly worst ever... I'll go back to feeling sorry for myself... The Rambling Man (talk) 19:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The Law Barnstar

 * Hah! It is worrying to see how many of those articles are mine. I have unfortunately hit a bit of a rut in terms of production, simply because I've been working on my Magnum Opus - a full, perfectly referenced biography of Edward Coke, along with full and Good articles on his cases, reports and institutes. Also, I recall something about having a law degree to finish and being on the SU this year. Ironholds (talk) 18:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Keeper of the Archives
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 18:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Airdates
Thanks for the ifnormations, Most of them seem correct who ever the ip user who added the copy vio ifno must have alter some of the original air dates i will need ot track these down rfom other places but the ifnormaiton does hlep lot-- Andrewcrawford  ( talk  -  contrib ) 14:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of people with reduplicated names for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article List of people with reduplicated names, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of people with reduplicated names until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

I'm notifying you as your comment at CFD led to my creating it! - Fayenatic (talk) 18:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Categories
Hi. Thank you very much for helping me out with my, er, categorical ignorance wrt Climbing Great Buildings. I am guessing wildly that you might know something about this topic (categories, not dangling under the dome of St Paul's on a rope, I mean ... or maybe both, what do I know?) and I wondered if you would mind, please, if I asked you a question about a totally unrelated article where I also have a category concern? If not, then fine - just tell me to b*gger off and I will do so and never darken your door again. But if you wouldn't mind a superquick look and an expert opinion - you can send the invoice to the usual address - then I'd be most grateful. Please advise. Thanks and best wishes, DBaK (talk) 10:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! That's very nice of you. Right then - here, at Stefan Zweig, is an article that is in 21 categories. Here, at Talk:Stefan_Zweig is some confused old person trying to understand if 21 categories is normal, good, bad, couldn't care less, unconnected with the price of fish etc or what. I have a tiny voice in my head (darn that medication) saying that it looks excessive, but I honestly wouldn't know if it is by general Wikipedia standards and if it really matters. (And it's a couple less than it used to be! I think we may have got rid of "People who knew Strauss and wrote a book about Maria Stuart and had lived in Bath once", or something else maybe a touch too specialized.) My attempts to ask other Zweig-interested editors what they think have not quite set the Thames on fire yet. It may of course be that it simply does not matter and that I should just STFU (whatever that means) but I'd rather be told that than just be left feeling clueless (though I should be used to it by now). Right now, while some of the cats he's in are obvious (yes, he was a Jewish Austrian who wrote), others don't seem to be supported by the text, which does make me wonder. I am shutting up now before this runs on to 8000 words but I'd love to hear your view. Cheers. DBaK (talk) 10:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for the comprehensive and very helpful reply. (Churchill made me feel much better!) I think I will take it back to the article (some time, probably not today) and have another look in the light of your comments. Is it OK if I quote you please? Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 12:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Heh, thanks - too modest, I suspect; and anyway when you've given me specific things like the bit from WP:CAT, plus your own experience/knowledge/opinion, I'd say that's veering strongly in the general direction of reliability ... thanks again, DBaK (talk) 13:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Review
After seeing a recent message of yours to Mocha2007 I would highly reccomend reviewing this remember, this is just as important as the rules and should be treated as such. Cocoandmocha (talk) 15:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC)