User talk:Bencherlite/Archive 9

List of Ben & Jerry's flavors‎
Hey. Awhile back you closed a requested move and moved Ben & Jerry's flavors‎ to List of Ben & Jerry's flavors‎, and Retired Ben & Jerry's flavors to List of discontinued Ben & Jerry's flavors‎. recently did a manual move back on both articles. I started a thread on ANI about this, but I was wondering if you could move both articles back and lock them against moves? —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Please reconsider your close. There was no conclusion/compromise/consensus reached, only two sides stating their case. Thank you. --Chunk Champion (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Could you please explain to me why the Haagen-Dazs page does not have to follow the "List of" standard? I tried to fix the page to coincide with the rules and HelloAnnyong comes along and changes it back citing WP:POINT. But yet on that page under Important Note it reads, "However, just because someone is making a point does not mean that they are disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate it. With that in mind, linking here should be done with care." These lists on this page are undeniably lists and so they should be marked as such to remain consistent with the guidelines.--Chunk Champion (talk) 16:47, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Your resources request
In regards to this request, I have managed to obtain scanned PDF versions of both documents. Please email me using Special:EmailUser/ThaddeusB if you still need want them & I will be happy to reply with a copy of the documents. --ThaddeusB (talk) 03:49, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

I Never Really Got to Say It Over There, But...
...they actually blocked me from accessing the English Wikipedia. No, I don't mean they took away my editing privileges. I mean that I actually couldn't even access the website. Not even Willy on Wheels was punished like that. You had me really scared, and I don't appreciate that.--66.177.73.86 (talk) 00:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * That's not actually something an admin can do. If you were unable to access the site, it was something your internet provider (or the proxy you were attempting to use) had done. --ThaddeusB (talk) 02:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Heads of Permanent Private Halls of the University of Oxford
I have nominated heads of permanent private halls of the university of oxford for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. ♪ daTheisen(talk) 15:04, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Master of the Rolls/archive1
Needs a revisit, when you get the chance. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Fly, Pegasus!
here we are. Feel free to post any additions you can find; I'll get the Inns of Court Bibliography out when I'm in the library next. Ironholds (talk) 02:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * A barrister's live, hectic? Perish the thought! Anything you can add in would be good - I have no plans past DYK until more modern material can be scavenged from your great library, so there's no pressure. Any chance of seeing you at the London December meetup, by the way? Ironholds (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Just say you are meeting some barristers! We have three there, if you unfortunately forget to add the word "student" before one of them :P. Ironholds (talk) 17:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd also be interested to hear your views on Inner Temple Library; I'm of the opinion that it isn't notable independently of the Temple. Thoughts? Ironholds (talk) 11:21, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Something I believe your people are considering, actually; the Committee report and recommendations is due out soon, iirc. I meant on WP, though :P. Ironholds (talk) 20:55, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Ooh, smashing. I should have a big load of Inner Temple sources to you tomorrow, btw. Ironholds (talk) 00:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

25 dyk award
Thanks for noticing! dm (talk) 19:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Launcelot Percival
Thanks for the tidy-up. Wrong Trinity College... what was I doing? FruitMonkey (talk) 10:09, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I thought that my edit to Percival's dad, linking him to his son, was the reason you found the article on Launcelot. Great edits by the way, looks much better. FruitMonkey (talk) 15:09, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Deleted category
Hello Bencherlite: I was going to create Category:American jazz violists for jazz viola player Mat Maneri, but the category was previously deleted. Any reason why this category can't be reinstated? Best regards, Hrdinský (talk) 06:40, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Hrdinský (talk) 07:10, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Shaw Prize/archive1
Hey there; can you revisit this FLC when you get the time? Many thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Bump. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Inner Temple sourcing
Here you go:
 * The Inner Temple: A community of communities - Clare Rider, ISBN 9781903942666
 * A portrait of the Inner Temple - Gerard Noel
 * Inner Temple garden : 'a new faire garden, envoironed with stronge brick walls' - Tia Sedley
 * The Inner Temple : a brief historical description - John Baker (bless his cotton socks)
 * A sketch of the Inner Temple Library - Wallace Breem
 * The Hall of the Inner Temple - EAP Hart
 * The ravages of the war in the Inner Temple - Frank McKinnon
 * The Society and Fellowship of the Inner Temple : an address delivered in the Inner Temple Hall, Monday, May 24th 1897 - William Willis
 * Masters of the Bench of the Hon. Society of the Inner Temple 1450-1883 and Masters of the Temple 1540-1883 - John Edward Martin, should be good for Benchers of the Inner Temple
 * Thanks! Ironholds (talk) 18:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Now that you're up and at it again, ping :). Ironholds (talk) 13:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Basically just see what you can see. No need to buy things says the man who just bought a book on the Court of Appeal just to get a triple-DYK ! I would have assumed they'd have a copy in the Library. The "brief historical description" may be the same as that on the website, the rest I'm not sure. "Ravages of War" would be particularly useful for 20th century history, as would the Noel and Sedley books. Ironholds (talk) 00:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Search Engine Spezify
Hello Bencherlite

I was going to add an entry for the visual search engine Spezify and found out it was already deleted.

Spezify is a nominee for the SIME Rising Stars of the North award http://sime.nu/09/awards/rising-stars-of-the-north/

It's also been talked about a lot online:

http://thenextweb.com/2009/05/12/search-spezify/ http://www.pcformat.co.uk/blog-entry/can-spezify-sexify-searches-01-10-09 http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/06/16/spezify-combines-several-media-types-into-an-impressive-visual-s/

Is there a reason not to include it in Wikipedia?

Simon

Sbyholm (talk) 17:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who use Custom Signatures
Following the Instructions on the Deletion review page: Why did you choose to delete this category while the results were: 3x delete, 3x keep, 1 rename. Im very interested in your reason...&lArr;&uArr; ©TriMoon™ Talk @ 16:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

December 9
Even taking into account that we're talking about Oxford, I'm still surprised by the number of relevant entries you found. That would work, if you wanted to set up something like that for a daily basis. The question I guess is whether you want to do that much work to set up every day like that, and I guess that decision is yours. If you don't want to do that much, maybe selecting just four or five per day might work. John Carter (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Answer
Re: this question - occasionally, but given that I have to consider what's been scheduled previously, taking future requests into account makes scheduling substantially harder. Raul654 (talk) 01:16, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
So glad to know my efforts are appreciated. Only saw it today as last two days of term (Nativity etc) are quite stressful for a primary school teacher. Best wishes (and a Happy Christmas) from Bashereyre (talk) 19:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Getting Back into things again
Hey, back again... Except for under a different name: i found the previous unprofessional. (Redskunk) I have some free time now, and want to know how to help wikipedia. I want to know what to help with. I've just been doing vandalism and AfD stuff right now. I'm interested in (possibly) becoming an administrator, but of course it would require work on my part, and my primary goal is the good of the encyclopedia over that. Not sure in what direction to go, and I find you a good reliable source of information/critique.

Also feel free to rip into what I've been doing if it would help :)

NativeForeigner (talk) 05:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for looking into it NativeForeigner (talk) 20:12, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm trying to determine notability for progamers, as some people that have participated in the highest level championships aren't mentioned, and in WP:NOTE it says that people in such events are notable. However this is regarding esports.  Additionally it should be noted that most available information will inherently be written in korean, so can that be cited or is it not considered a good source?  I feel like I could write these articles, but want to make sure they are notable before proceeding.
 * Also looking into StarCraft professional competition it appears to be very long mostly consisting of lists which although relevant aren't listed on say Olympics. I think parallels should be drawn.  Should these long lists of winners and runner ups etc be made a separate list? NativeForeigner (talk) 20:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

A christmas card from Geaugagrrl
  "And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,   I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.  For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."  Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)  ~ Geaugagrrl talk is wishing you a Merry Christmas. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

Gower Peninsula
Hi Bencherlite, hope you had a good holiday. Could you be so kind as to move the article Gower peninsula to Gower Peninsula. Don't know why it has been moved to a lower case article, but its a place, and it should be capitalised. Both the Encyclopedia of Wales and the area's website gowerpeninsula.org.uk spell it with a capital P. Thanks FruitMonkey (talk) 11:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Cheers. FruitMonkey (talk) 11:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Christmas present, Sah!
Here you go. Obviously it isn't at GA yet, and partial payment of a debt is unacceptable (har) but I thought you'd get a kick out of this. Ironholds (talk) 09:22, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I have five GANs needing reviewing, if you have some time free :P. Ironholds (talk) 09:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you kindly! No need to worry, the new book is very good (although it claims to have been published in 2010, much to my annoyance). Ironholds (talk) 09:42, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * ..and (sorry to bother you) a question of advice; as a law editor, would you rather see a) a large, accurate and well-referenced article on the Court of Chancery or b) a large, accurate and well-referenced article on Sir Edward Coke? I've got the time to write one, and sources and drafts for both. Ironholds (talk) 01:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * And, as promised.. Ironholds (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Your FLCs
Hey. Thanks for your note. Yes, the loss was devastating but thankfully the only blot. I'm slowly coming out of the stupor but it's tough. It's been a wake-up call and a reminder that life really is too short, and that life really is fragile. Anyway, that aside, (and beautiful photo by the way), I'll happily trample all over your paltry offerings...! By your beds....! The Rambling Man (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Guto Puw
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found a number of concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Guto Puw/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

William Terriss
Hello. You added the Oxford univ. project tag to Terriss's article. He attended Oxford briefly but did not graduate. I don't think that, under these circumstances, he should be tagged for that project. There must be a lot of people with a stronger connection to Oxford who should be tagged instead. I suggest that we delete the tag. It seems to me that the most relevant projects for this bio are Biography and Theatre. I don't even see why he should be tagged with the London project. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks for the message. -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:Wikibreak enforcer
Thank you, Mr Bencherlite! Thanks a million!  Kayau  Wuthering Heights  VANITY FAIR   paradise lost  10:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Garrow
Thank you for your William Garrow work; as you've probably seen, it got a shiny star in the corner :). Give me a poke when you're ready to expand and streamline the Inner Temple stuff for FAC; until then, I'll be right over here. Ironholds (talk) 20:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Lewis Gilbertson
Hi Bencherlite. I've replied on my talk page about avoiding redirects. However, Wikipedia Wales policy for geographic descriptors is to use the contemporary spelling of place names. hence we use, for instance, Caernarfon, even though at the time the town may have been spelt Carnarvon or Caernarvon. Similarly, we refer to the Ffestiniog Railway for its whole history, even though for most of that history it was known in English as the Festiniog Railway. It is not true to say that at the time Lewis Gilbertson was born the place was known as Cardiganshire, rather than Ceredigion. It has been known in Welsh as Ceredigion since long before the Normans invented the term Cardiganshire. English has now adopted that spelling, rather than the bastardised Cardigan.

The UK policy guideline is set out at Naming conventions (UK counties), where it advises we should use the current administrative counties:-


 * 1. We should use the current, administrative, county. E.g. Eton is in Berkshire, not Buckinghamshire.


 * This approach is consistent with most local and national government literature, some private sector literature, will be familiar to most readers and writers, and indeed the approach will apply even if boundaries change again. It is also easy for people to find out where a particular village is, as maps with administrative boundaries are freely available online. While historic county maps do exist, it is hard to find one with maps of modern urban areas and city and borough boundaries transposed against historic counties. It is also consistent with other encyclopedias such as the 1911 Encyclopedia, which specifically calls Cromarty a 'former county'.

In Wales, of course, the principal area, whether a county or county borough, applies.

It is therefore not acceptable to say, under either the UK or Wales guidelines, that Gilbertson was born in Cardiganshire. A case could be made out that it would be acceptable to say that "Gilbertson was born in Ceredigion, then known as Cardiganshire", though I suspect even that would fall foul of the Wikipedia Wales guidelines. Skinsmoke (talk) 00:43, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Ozzie ruwels & Oxford
Fair enough. (Thanks for the reply.) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Ozzie Ruwels
 * No problem. It's annoying that HotCat doesn't let you leave edit summaries, and as it's only laziness on my part that makes me use the tool, I'll try and be clearer in future. Regards, BencherliteTalk 11:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for my mis-spelling of ruwels - I'm afraid I'm hopeless without a spellchecker ...

"It's annoying that HotCat doesn't let you leave edit summaries" - I agree. (Very annoying.)

"it's only laziness on my part that makes me use the tool" - Hey! Tools are there to be used and make life easier. It's not your fault that this tool has its limitations ...

Regards, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Rhodes scholarship
As for the Rhodes scholarship not actually being an award or prize of the university, it seems odd not to categorise it in that sub-cat when it's probably the widest-known OU scholarship and you can't be a Rhodes scholar anywhere else. Just a thought. BencherliteTalk 11:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Good point(s). Fair enough. Please do as you think best. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Ah, the merits of discussion and consensus-forming. We're on fire today! BencherliteTalk 11:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Surely you don't expect me to disagree?
 * Of course we're on fire!! Why wouldn't we be!!!! No, don't answer that. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

"Conversion"

 * "Following discussion on our talk-pages, user:Pdfpdf has converted to my way of thinking..." - Have you seen The Blues Brothers (film)? Pdfpdf (talk) 13:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

African American Actors
It appears that you edited (or removed) the African American Actors page, however, there is an Asian American Actor page, not to mention a "Pornographic" African American Actors page. I was genuinely trying to search for a specific African American Actor and I was directed here by wiki, only to find out that the page doesn't exist. Has the African American Actors page been moved? Or has it been deleted? Thanks. Joe bob attacks (talk) 03:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by William Gibson/archive1
Needs a revisit, when you get the chance. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 15:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi there; I saw that you edited the article recently, but can you follow up on the comments so I know what still needs to be addressed? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 01:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * P.S. I'll try to recruit somebody to take a look at Bodley's Librarian. Thanks for your patience. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments on my FLCs
I get the thumb screws out every time I nominate... Nah. It's doubtless due to the outstanding quality of the list when it's nominated...! Plus I don't do these niche lists, I'm a mainstream kindaguy... (anyway, I always review your lists as soon as I see them pop up...) The Rambling Man (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

User page deletion
Hi. Sorry to bother you but I was searching the help desk archive for help in my problem and I found your comments here. Is there any chance you can delete my userpage and restore only the last edit? I am currently receiving criticism from another editor due to views on wikipedia policy I have in previous versions of my talk page. Naturally as I have removed this information from my talk page I no longer wish others to see it (as my views have also changed somewhat) but this editor has gone to the trouble of finding an old version of my userpage and posting it on the talk page of another article as ammunition against my general credibility. I would greatly appreciate it if you can delete the history. Freikorp (talk) 01:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour
Could you renown my count here in "miguel nocte" thank's--MIKEREADfr (talk) 15:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * wellreceived your message, thank's Bencherlite--MIKEREADfr (talk) 03:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
Thanks for the tick. I don't envisage using this much, but might come in handy on occasion. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 20:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Old Trafford TFA
Hey man, thanks for making that correction to the extract from Old Trafford at WP:TFAR. I wouldn't have noticed it myself! – PeeJay 11:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

FLC
Hi. You left some comments at Featured list candidates/List of Braathens destinations/archive1 a while ago. When you have time, could you cap or respond or on my replies. Thanks, Arsenikk (talk)  20:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Catching up
Hey dude. Been totally maxed out at work and at home so just beginning to catch up on my backlog of FLC reviews. Good news, Laudian chapster up next. Hope I don't ruffle too many dark blue feathers...! The Rambling Man (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, welcome to Apple's beautiful world of beautiful people using beautiful devices and beautiful browsers to access the interweb wherever the heck you like...! Enjoy!  The Rambling Man (talk) 21:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Quick off the mark my friend! Good work on that list, by the way.  Keep up the stirling effort.  The Rambling Man (talk) 22:29, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

User talk:GardmanVS
Hi Bencherlite, Thanks for taking action on the above by blocking him/her and hopefully he will now find a more constructive hobby to occupy their time, cheers Tmol42 (talk) 15:10, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

LG Mobile World Cup & USS Washington (BB-56)
Hello there. I have just started working on some more content, and I wrote LG Mobile world cup and nommed it for GA. It would be great if you could give the relatively short article a quick lookover. urged me to nom it, so I feel that it's probably ready. Secondly, I'm working on the USS washington with, and will be writing an expanded section on the naval battle of guadalcanal. Does it have any specific issues? Thanks, NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 01:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Braathens destinations/archive1
Needs a second look. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Law shtuff
this and this may interest you. Ironholds (talk) 18:26, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you kindly for the authorlinks; the latter FAC has been removed since I was unaware you couldn't have more than one up at any one time. On a related note, I've got a copy of Megarry's book on the Inns of Court, so let me know when you want to make an FAC push on Inner Temple. Ironholds (talk) 19:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Adaptively Reused churches and Former churches
Hi Bencherlite, I've distinguished "Adaptively Reused churches" from "Former churches" because former churches could refer to any church building no longer used as a church, which would include demolition, closure, abandonment, ruin, etc. Adaptively Reused is an historic preservation / architectural conservation term for the reuse of a structure. For churches, this would include continuation as a church but for a different Christian denomination. Hope this clarifies that neither category is really a subcategory of each other, although they do heavily overlap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by James Russiello (talk • contribs) 20:23, 10 February 2010
 * I believe some mistake were made. Thank you for catching the St. Cross and Hove articles
 * Adaptive Reuse is the standard term in the architectural conservation / historic preservation / restoration industry, used as a keyword in nearly every publication on the subject.

Peter Fox (librarian)
Hello again, There is a strange situation at Cambridge University Library in that the Latin Wikipedia provides a much better list of the Librarians than the English one. Peter Fox also had a stub in the la:wikipedia which I have translated, but have not created it in case it gets deleted. Do you think it is worth improving, perhaps using Who's Who? My text is at Talk:Cambridge University Library.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 08:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your offer of Who's Who details. I decided to added the Peter Fox article and see what happens next as I believe the information to be valid even though Latin WP is not allowed as a reliable source here. In depth coverage of the long series of CUL librarians would be a worthwhile project for somebody but I won't be doing it. I have just done two: F. W. Ratcliffe, and now Peter Fox. The Bodleian now has a very good set of articles. Best wishes.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 05:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

"rate of support"
Okay, so two supports in 18 hours, now you can no longer accuse my reviewers of possible sycophancy...! The Rambling Man (talk) 18:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sent from my iPhone. That was the first thing I removed from my iPhone!  Still, enjoyed the list, keep up the good work.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Dean Ireland's Professor of the Exegesis of Holy Scripture
Hello! Your submission of Dean Ireland's Professor of the Exegesis of Holy Scripture at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Calmer  Waters  22:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Featured List review
Thanks for your comments at the Featured list candidates/List of Washington & Jefferson College alumni/archive1. I'm actually ambivalent about whether the images on the side even add anything to the list. Do you think the list would stand a better chance of being promoted if I were to remove the images or reduce the number of them? --GrapedApe (talk) 04:50, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice, I'll be working on this now.--GrapedApe (talk) 16:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Selden Society
Any way you could upload a cropped copy of your John Baker photo? I'm just illustrating my new article. Ironholds (talk) 16:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Neda Agha-Soltan Graduate Scholarship

 * Passed; seems excellent! You also need to check your email more often :P. If you're up for a bit of browsing, Pepper v Hart might interest you; a famous case taught completely incorrectly by universities. Ironholds (talk) 06:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That's a.. pretty good excuse :p. Remind me to use it should I ever qualify! Ironholds (talk) 22:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Just wanted to say, Thank you! -- Black Falcon (talk) 20:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Re Pepper
God, makes it sounds like a trusts case! I note you're paying attention to this article (which I'm very proud of); Wikidea and I differ on our styles. Could you comment here please? Ironholds (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the C(RTP)A. Could I be an absolute ass? I hate to further use up your time, but if I email you a load of PvH citations, could you see if you can grab the things from Westlaw and the like? Ironholds (talk) 22:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK count
A question: you list yourself as having 51 Did you know? contributions at List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs, but on your page User:Bencherlite/DYK I see only 39. What's the difference in count? What am I not seeing?


 * Thanks for the explanation—it all comes clear! Binksternet (talk) 06:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)