User talk:Bencoland

Please don't add copyrighted material to Wikipedia. A comedian's work is surely copyrighted. RickK 23:10, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:St etheldredas church interior.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:St etheldredas church interior.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 12:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:St etheldredas church exterior.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:St etheldredas church exterior.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 12:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Copyright images
Hmm.. it's difficult to prove that you uploaded a copyrighted image as public domain, while the source itself contradicts. What you can do is to convert the license into copyrighted file with fair use rationale. Please read WP:FAIR really carefully that the image is not easily replaceable, which is not the case in your files. Otherwise, ask the author/photographer to alter the license in the source into one of the suitable Wikipedia licenses. At Flickr, it should be CC by attribution (BY) or with CC by sharealike (SA). &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 15:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:St etheldredas christ stained glass.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:St etheldredas christ stained glass.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 11:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:St etheldredas st bridget stained glass.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:St etheldredas st bridget stained glass.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 11:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Copyright notices
I've replaced the copyvio notice of 2 images into the current one. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 09:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I removed the notices for the moment. Please don't forget to update those 3 images. At sometime, somebody else might put again the imagevio notice if you forget. Cheers. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 10:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * In fact, I've deleted Image:St etheldredas christ stained glass.jpg and Image:St etheldredas st bridget stained glass.jpg because they haven't been released under a free licence. The images can be undeleted later if it happens. Conscious 13:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hey Bencoland, it's me, Mr. Krabby Patty. Thanks for the message you left. Sorry for the late reply because I had no idea how to post a message for you. Also, I posted something on the Brainpop talk page and I want your opinion on it. Thanks! PS. I'll make a userpage soon. Mr. Krabby Patty 04:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Rollback
You have been granted with the rollback permission on the basis of your recent effort on dealing with vandalism. The rollback is a revert tool which can lessens the strains that normal javascripts such as twinkle put on the Wikipedia servers. You will find that you will revert faster through the rollback than through the normal reversion tools such as javascripts and the undo feature, which means that you could save time especially when reverting very large articles such as the George W. Bush page. To use it, simply click the link which should look like [ rollback ] (which should appear unbloded if you have twinkle installed) on the lastest diff page. The rollback link will also appear on the history page beside the edit summary of the lastest edit. For more information, you may refer to this page, alternatively, you may also find this tutorial on rollback helpful. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

BrainPOP
Hi. I notice that you have edited this article in the past. An editor has nominated it for deletion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/BrainPOP_(2nd_nomination)#BrainPOP Feel free to contribute to the AfD discussion. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Shriek-of-the-mutilated.png
Thanks for uploading File:Shriek-of-the-mutilated.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)