User talk:Bendesuza12381

August 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rahul Kohli has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rahul Kohli was changed by Bendesuza12381 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926948 on 2020-08-15T08:58:20+00:00

December 2020
Until you have a reliable, secondary source that confirmes their relationship stop adding it to Rahul Kohli's article. They have split up but secondary sources aren't as easy to find for Kholi as they are for other people, so it was removed altogether because of the primary sourcing. discuss on the talk page and seek consensus for its inclusion if it botheres you so much. Alex (talk) 02:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


 * You seem to be pretty confident on something you have zero information on? You have no sources, primary or secondary. You do not own this page. Explain why the information can just not stay on the page until proven or disproven otherwise? Ben. Bendesuza12381 (talk) 02:19, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * It is a BLP and must have reliable sources. If you only have Instagram then it should stay off until reliable, secondary sources can be found. Multiple editors have disputed it, so the information is clearly disputed. I have never stated I own the article, but if RELIABLE secondary sources cannot be found then it should not be included. Alex (talk) 02:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Alex. The information is still relevant to the subject. Multiple sources when searching the subjects name bring up the relationship. As stated previously. This information has been on this page for a number of years now. So until a new source confirms otherwise. It is still relevant. Bendesuza12381 (talk) 02:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You're not understanding my comments, at all. RELIABLE. SECONDARY. Most things coming up on google are not even reliable sources. The information had been repeatedly disputed by multiple editors and this is a BLP. You are continuing to ignore concerns and edit war, so I am taking this to administrator attention. Alex (talk) 02:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


 * As stated previously. You have not had an issue with this information on this page for years, and suddenly you have decided the sources are not reliable, and you are stating your opinion as fact to me. Again. Until the information is proven otherwise. The information remains the most relevant. If you want to go running to the administrators be my guest. Once again, as I stated previously. You do not own this page and you are removing relevant information about the source because you don’t want it there. Bendesuza12381 (talk) 02:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * It is not "because [I] don't want it there", it is because, as I havr stated multiple times, this is a BLP and the information does not have a reliable, secondary source and has been fisputed multiple times yet you seem to ignore that fact. I am well aware I do not own the article, I havr never stated that I do. Both of us have reverted more than we should have though, so I suggest you read the policy on edit warring and the three revert rule, and I shall do the same. If you'd like to add your comments to the thread with the admin, you can see the thread here. (Note that this thread was purely to seek advice on whether Instagram is acceptable for this and seek further advice.) Alex (talk) 02:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Alex. I think until this is confirmed we should leave the page as it has been. Please update me with any updates. Regards Ben. Bendesuza12381 (talk) 02:52, 17 December 2020 (UTC)