User talk:BenficaNNossaPaixao/Archive 6


 * Archive 1 — Archive 2 — Archive 3 — Archive 4 — Archive 5

Troféu António Pratas
Olá, suponho que sejas português. Como deves saber existe um troféu António Pratas para a LPB (1ª divisão) e a Proliga (2ª divisão). A que o Benfica ganhou em 2007 foi quando jogava na Proliga e nesse ano só houve uma edição para essa divisão. As coisas ficaram a meio por lapso meu na página, mas o que se deve fazer é acrescentar os campeões das edições da Proliga. Secretaria (talk) 16:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of S.L. Benfica founders for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of S.L. Benfica founders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of S.L. Benfica founders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 07:30, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited S.L. Benfica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Record (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nemanja Matić, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:54, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The Source you were attempting to use does not indicate conclusively that this player has signed for Chelsea. A player saying he has is irrelevant, anything can happen that could cause the deal not to be concluded and we are WP:Crystal balling until Chelsea themselves announce and then multiple reliable sources say so. We are an encyclopaedia not a rumour or fan site. This person article is a Biographies of living persons and as such must be dealt with appropriately using reliable sources. Please desist until such time as the deal is concluded by the club. Blethering  Scot  16:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello BenficaNNossaPaixao, I'm glad that you read and acknowledged Blethering Scot's message and ceased reverting myself and Matty as the transfer is yet to be confirmed by either club and reference you provided wasn't conclusive and didn't support your claims. People kept adding disruptive content in relation to Chelsea the last few days which is why the page had to be protected. In regards to the honours section I never said it was purely for first place as you suggested in your edit summary here, but Matić didn't actually receive any award for coming second therefore there's no reason for it to be included. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 16:39, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Nemanja Matić shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Admiral Caius (talk) 16:12, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Im glad to see you undid your own edit. Please see and add any comments you see fit to Talk:Nemanja Matić where a discussion has been started. No further changes should be made to the page without reliable sources saying any deal has been officially announced by the club or a discussion has been completed where WP:consensus has been achieved to say it should be. I strongly advise you to avoid edit warring. Blethering  Scot  16:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fredy Montero. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. – Michael (talk) 18:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fredy Montero, you may be blocked from editing. – Michael (talk) 19:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: ‎Matic
I did the latter, and therefore reverted your edit as the source states the transfer is still in progress. Glad to see you've since reverted your addition. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Sílvio Manuel Pereira - e outros?
Compatriota BNNP, AL "por aqui",

peço encarecidamente o favor de não me reverteres como fizeste neste jogador, porque eu sabia exactamente o que estava a fazer, o outro utilizador pôs os três jogos na caixa mas esqueceu-se de alterar a data, logo foi uma edição inválida OK? Como eu pus a seguir, já está 100% actualizado.

Mais: ventos de mudança? O Benfica jogou com cinco (!) portugueses hoje na Taça da Liga, o Porto com uns fantásticos três, isto parece que se está a encaminhar...claro que NÃO, no próximo jogo volta tudo ao mesmo, a jogarem com dois, um ou menos que isso! E não, não sou do Sporting, não tenho clube, o Sporting é outra mentira, tem NOVE portugueses no plantel (e o S.C. Olhanense tem nove portugueses e VINTE estrangeiros!!), e no fim deste ano, sejam ou não campeões, vai ser uma sangria, e eles a dizerem "não me cortem as pernas". O campeonato "português" é vergonhoso, lembro-me de consultar o Zerozero.pt o ano passado e ver equipas da segunda divisão com 20 estrangeiros, não há equipa B este ano que não tenha menos de 10.

Atentamente, feliz 2014 --AL (talk) 23:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Bom, apesar de ter sido educado e ter tido o cuidado de dizer que nada me move contra o Benfica (não tenho clube, repito), parece que não vou saber a tua opinião ao respeito, nem sobre os aspectos técnicos do artigo do Sílvio nem sobre o campeonato "português". Tudo bem, não incomodo mais --AL (talk) 21:47, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

OK, i will... --AL (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Ivan Manuel Amorim dos Santos
"Moving on" like you said,

gostava de saber se a ligação deste jogador com o Benfica é correcta, se não me engano, há uns anos aparecia que ele efectivamente tinha pertencido ao clube sendo emprestado, no ZEROZERO.PT, mas agora nada, não sei em que "acreditar".

Agora suponho que me podes ajudar/responder, uma vez que esta mensagem é 100% enciclopédica. Estou correcto?

Feliz fim de semana --AL (talk) 19:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC)