User talk:BengHistory

July 2021
Brother kabulshahi also mohyal Brahmin Dynasty, janjua is a jatt clan, sanghar ali janjua helped Babar so that's why they become powerful because of mugals, actual Dynasty of kabulshahi was Mohyal brshmins please edit this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.206.179.63 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
TrangaBellam (talk) 19:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Community sanctions notification
--RegentsPark (comment) 21:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Any further attempt to interpret scholarly works based on the authors caste will result in an indefinitel block. FYI. --RegentsPark (comment) 21:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

BengHistory (talk) 22:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Dear Editor, not sure if the notice was meant for me. I have not tried to discredit any scholarly work based on the author's caste. I was editing the page on a caste community Baidya. There some fellow-editors were not accepting any of the source I was giving if the source happened be authored by any individual belonging to that very caste (viz. Baidya). I was just pointing to this very point as mentioned in that notice, i.e., you simply cannot put an 'unreliable' tag on any author just because he belonged to a particular caste (which they have been doing repetitively, as you can see in that page, in the talk section). I told them that according to the same logic, authors belonging to other castes can also be doubted to be holding some grudge. The matter of fact is, I think that source, if reliable, should be incorporated irrespective of the author's caste. But they are not allowing it and summarily rejecting any Baidya author's work as being motivated. They even went to that extent as to call certain editors 'caste warriors' and 'POV-pusher'. You can check it yourself. I request you to see it to it that the page is handled neutrally and no editor is given a free hand (by virtue of simply having more edits to his/her name) and be allowed to express his own opinion (even to the extent of using exclamatory marks, as you can see), and to reject sources based on the caste of an author. Thanks

Signature
Posts are signed at the end. Not at start. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste articles
BengHistory (talk) 16:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC) You do not need to place threats on a regular basis.

July 2021
Hello, I'm Ekdalian. You have been adding or changing content in an article, Vaid, but you didn't provide reliable sources properly, and did not even bother to provide complete citation; providing url only is not accepted here, read WP:CITE. Do not engage in original research or synthesis. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 13:38, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * [(talk) 16:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC) 1) I am entitled to add contents in wikipedia, that is called editing. Do I need seek your permission from you before each of my edits? Do you own all of these articles? 2) I have given urls in each of the sources, will add more details within few days. 3) Specify the lines which you deem as original research or synthesis. I have quoted 4-5 lines, and all of them have been quoted verbatim. 4) I do not think you are entitled to term anything as 'unconstructive', please refrain from making such opinionated remarks and realize that your apparent high-position in wikipedia does not entitle you to pass such judgements. ThanksBengHistory (talk) 16:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

WP:TPO
The guideline says, Generally, you should not break up another editor's text by interleaving your own replies to individual points. This confuses who said what and obscures the original editor's intent. In your own posts, you may wish to use the or   templates to quote others' posts. Thanks. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:55, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

New message from TrangaBellam
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement § BengHistory. TrangaBellam (talk) 21:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)