User talk:Bengalurumaga

Discretionary sanctions alert
O3000 (talk) 20:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Article CNN is under discretionary sanctions. Your recent edit violated Enforced BRD: If an edit you make is challenged by reversion you must discuss the issue on the article talk page and wait 24 hours (from the time of the original edit) before reinstating your edit. I suggest you self-revert. O3000 (talk) 20:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to American Airlines have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 22:11, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Mahlzeit, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Violation of 1RR and 24-hr BRD cycle at Economic policy of Donald Trump
This edit is a violation of 1RR and 24-hr BRD cycle at Economic policy of Donald Trump. You should self-revert immediately. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. El_C 18:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Hi there, when changes you make are reverted, as they were here, your recourse per our Bold, Revert, Discuss process is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for the changes you wish to make, not to resubmit them as you did here. These resubmissions without consensus are disruptive, and are considered edit-warring, which I see you have already been warned about. If you keep it up, you might quickly find your editing privileges interrupted, which would be unfortunate for something so avoidable. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and it seems fairly clear that you are editing from to continue your edit-warring and to avoid any discussions. Note that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC) .