User talk:Benjamin Fincher

My name is Ben Fincher. I am currently working on my Masters in Technical and Professional Writing. I have a degree in History from Middle Georgia State University and work as a Teaching Assistant in the school's writing center. In my free time: I read, workout, and play video games.
 * Hey Ben, nice to meet you. Any particular video games rise above the others in your opinion? Dcb1986 (talk) 00:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Huge league of legends and battlefront 2 fan. I also love fallen order... basically, anything StarWars related

Hi Ben, it looks like we have this class together also! I see a few other familiar names from the HCI class also! I enjoy playing with my kids Nintendo Switch Lite, especially Zelda, Kirby, and Minecraft after they go to bed. Please don't tell my kids. Nice to meet you! Acmunoz14 (talk) 23:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Angela Munoz
 * Hey glad to see you in another class. I love my switch and play it all the time.


 * Hi Ben! What kind of workouts do you enjoy? Bdokolasa (talk) 13:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * My favorite types of workouts are HIIT (high-intensity interval training), especially with battle ropes.Benjamin Fincher (talk) 02:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Benjamin Fincher, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

3cs log I hope this is part of my 3cs log. I added a synopsis to the Faith of the Graffiti article and some links. I found two sources for the paper, however, one of them did not want to connect on my laptop even though it worked previously. I also chose my article to improve- Shara McCallum a female poet whose latest work has not been added to the page. Benjamin Fincher (talk) 19:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Madwoman (book) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Madwoman (book), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 06:26, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

I have updated the article and published it to live.Benjamin Fincher (talk) 18:17, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Relflexive statement
"Critiquing articles""

Wikipedia is a living organism that is growing and changing by the minute. The amount of time and work put into a single article is astounding. I was unaware of Wikipedia's rating system and importance scale. The number of security features built into Wikipedia is reassuring and shows that some articles are credible and reliable. I chose to critique the article on Shara McCallum an American/Jamaican poet. I noted that it needed to be updated and expanded. I also realized that none of her works had their own Wikipedia page so I created one on her newest work Madwoman. I decided to update her page with her newest awards and work and then focused primarily on the Madwoman article.

""Sunmnarizing your contributions""

For FOG I wrote the original synopsis and contributed to its numerous revisions along with writing sections in style and Publication. My biggest contributions to Fog, in my personal opinion, was my addition of sources to the bibliography and citation pages and my editing throughout the creation of the article. I found many of the books and articles quoted in the article and expanded the bibliography. Once the majority of the article was written I went through each section and fixed punctuation errors, poorly written sentences, and places where the writing was disjointed. Likewise, I removed sections that were written in a manner conflicting with Wikipedia standards. For Shara McCallum, I made minor edits to the page, updated the information, and ensured the accuracy of the information. The Madwoman article I wrote entirely. I did independent research, learned how to format a Wikipedia page, and created sections based on the requirements. The article went through several iterations but I am content with the finished product.

Links to the articles I worked one:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madwoman_(book) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shara_McCallum

""Peer Review""

The peer-review process was extremely beneficial! I was given excellent feedback by on how to expand my article and sections to incorporate. She suggested incorporating new sections that talked about the author's background, writing process, and overcoming. The peer-review also allowed me to see how others were approaching their projects and their general outlines and setup. I tried to inform my peers of necessary changes, mostly proof-reading and writing for Wikipedia, and encouraged them to continue with their work. I peer-reviewed two articles- Capricorn Records and Little Men. Capricorn Records needed a lot of work and development with most of the sections being blank. Little Men was in a good place but needed some expanding and proofreading.

""Feedback""

I was given feedback in the FOG article after removing sections I felt were biased, I was sure to quote the sections and put them on the talk page so if the person disagreed they would still have the available work. My Madwoman page was flagged for copyright violation due to a mistake I made when I put notes I was making to my live page instead of my sandbox. I appreciated the copyright flag and was sure to avoid any such mistakes in the future.

""Wikipedia generally""

I learned that writing and maintaining a Wikipedia article is significantly more difficult than I imagined. Each article takes an enormous amount of time and forces people to communicate in an unorthodox manner. Writing for Wikipedia is a unique experience, unlike anything I have ever done. The technical writing aspects are informative and the research and citations are approached differently from a normal research assignment. Wikipedia offers a quick place for people to find (hopefully if maintained) reliable information on any given topic. This sharing and access to knowledge expand the public's understanding and knowledge. Benjamin Fincher (talk) 15:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)


 * You should use proper subheads here, correct wiki links, and correct formatting (Madwoman is a book, right? This was apparently your project, though you never claimed it in the WIkiEdu dashboard). These would be evidence of your learned literacy of the platform this semester. Also, I question your use of "unorthodox" and "normal"; I does not sound as if you feel editing WP was rewarding as maybe writing a research paper would have been. (Am I reading too much into this?) Did you help to improve the articles you found lacking in your peer reviews? Thank you for your contributions and final thoughts. —Grlucas (talk) 15:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Madwoman (book)
Hello! Your submission of Madwoman (book) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 03:01, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Madwoman (book)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)