User talk:Benjamin Franklin Clay

Speedy deletion nomination of Petallel Cloud Computing


A tag has been placed on Petallel Cloud Computing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Petallel Cloud Computing and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JNW (talk) 01:51, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Petallel Cloud Computing. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:02, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 02:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)


 * As a reminder, Wikipedia is not a venue for publishing original research. Wikipedia articles must be based in verifiable fact, and your original research is not verifiable. Even if your article had not had a promotional tone—and the line about "improve your business" certainly pushed it into that category—an article not based on reliable sources would still be subject to deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 02:36, 19 October 2009 (UTC)