User talk:Benjaminevans82

CfD nomination of Category:Nightclubs in Birmingham
Category:Nightclubs in Birmingham, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Black Falcon (Talk) 16:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trevose Head Lighthouse
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Trevose Head Lighthouse, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. neon white talk 13:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Eqonomize!
An article that you have been involved in editing, Eqonomize!, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Eqonomize!. Thank you. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 18:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Animatedsaintpiran.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Animatedsaintpiran.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Tribute Western Counties West
A tag has been placed on Tribute Western Counties West, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Christopher Kraus (talk) 00:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with EUMETNET
Hello. Concerning your contribution, EUMETNET, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, EUMETNET appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. EUMETNET has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:EUMETNET and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:EUMETNET with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:EUMETNET.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:51, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Eddystonelighthouse.jpg
Hi when did you take this pic?Geni 01:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Antarctic SLP
I replied to your request on the Climate of Antarctica talk page. Just in case you weren't checking it... Hope it helps. StephenHudson (talk) 18:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Opera House (nightclub)


The article The Opera House (nightclub) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Promotional in tone, notability is not established by "multiple, reliable, third-party sources". In short, it's not Ministry of Sound or anywhere near.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rodhull andemu  22:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Berties


The article Berties has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tagishsimon (talk) 21:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Wolf Rock, Cornwall
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Wolf Rock, Cornwall, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Wolf Rock, Cornwall appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Wolf Rock, Cornwall has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (Verified source pre-dates article through Internet Wayback Archive.) –Whitehorse1 16:44, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Lizard Lighthouse
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Lizard Lighthouse, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Lizard Lighthouse appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lizard Lighthouse has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (Verified source pre-dates article through Internet Wayback Archive.) –Whitehorse1 23:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Wadebridge Bridal Shop.jpg
File:Wadebridge Bridal Shop.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Wadebridge Bridal Shop.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:15, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Wadebridge Methodist Church.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Wadebridge Methodist Church.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:15, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Wadebridge TIC.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Wadebridge TIC.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:16, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * File:The Challenge Bridge.jpg is now available as Commons:File:The Challenge Bridge.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:17, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Wadebridge The old Bridge.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Wadebridge The old Bridge.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:17, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Somatic anxiety‎


The article Somatic anxiety‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Soiregistered (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Booby's Bay
I have nominated Booby's Bay, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Booby's Bay. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simple Bob (talk) 08:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Vault Beach
I have nominated Vault Beach, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Vault Beach. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simple Bob (talk) 08:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Benjaminevans82! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Annie Vernon -

Proposed deletion of Wine-Doors


The article Wine-Doors has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * project no longer maintained and is basically dead

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. dave (talk) 05:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Tall Trees for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tall Trees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tall Trees until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Herp Derp (talk) 19:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Eddystonelighthouse.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eddystonelighthouse.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 01:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Winefish


The article Winefish has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SL93 (talk) 21:52, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Boron neutron capture therapy
It's proposed to be merged into Neutron capture therapy of cancer, which is more complete and is 98% about boron anyway. I'm not sure who started this article in 2006, as the history is corrupt. But I'm notifying you as one of the early "authors." S B Harris 00:12, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:RAF St Eval.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RAF St Eval.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rcbutcher (talk) 01:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Linux office suite software
Category:Linux office suite software, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:12, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Myxicola infundibulum) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Myxicola infundibulum, Benjaminevans82!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Note that taxoboxes should normally include only major taxonomic ranks, not sub- or super- ranks (suborder, subfamily, etc)"

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Wine-Doors


A tag has been placed on Wine-Doors, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jonnymoon96 (talk) 01:13, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Wine-Doors for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wine-Doors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wine-Doors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jonnymoon96 (talk) 01:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Raimondiceras) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Raimondiceras, Benjaminevans82!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please write in complete sentences, as Wikipedia is not a database."

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 03:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Wadebridge school crest.GIF
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wadebridge school crest.GIF. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

2003 Red Square bombing moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2003 Red Square bombing, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:46, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of JULES for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JULES is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/JULES until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Mark WikiProject Linux as inactive?
Hi! I was directed to your talk page by the participants list on  WikiProject Linux. I've started a discussion whether we can keep it running, or mark it as inactive.–  Abuluntu  ( talk 06:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Winshell.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Winshell.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MeWa


The article MeWa has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:N"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of DESG for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DESG is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/DESG until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Elshad (talk) 11:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at  on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 20:54, 25 January 2024 (UTC)