User talk:Benjaminzyg9402

September 2017
Hello, I'm Zawl. I noticed that you made a change to an article, SCP Foundation, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Za  wl  10:27, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. — Za  wl  10:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. –72 (talk) 10:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Unblock me
--UTRSBot (talk) 22:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 09:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Hey
WHY I CANNOT BE UNBLOCKED I WAITED FOR WEEKS BUT STILL BLOCKED. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 03:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Ok I give up
I will follow to guildeline and won’t do it again. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 03:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

For the admin to investigate the cause
abusing the block system which I didn’t do it but I told him I just promised to fix the edit like John Xena did which is new and I am new but he abused it.. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 03:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC) Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 03:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


 * You blanked the introduction of an article with an edit summary of "Fixed typo". You then faked an unblock message after you were block. Maybe it was a touch hasty, but it was a good block and not at all abusive. —C.Fred (talk) 03:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Sigh
I am so sorry C.Fred, I will try and fix the problem I caused. I wish to be unblocked but sigh. 😪😪😪 it wont help me get into s better place but a unblock will help me cheer me up. I already have therapy about it but the administration need to support the disability needs which is a great thing. Again I was saying I am so sorry. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 04:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


 * We are not here to cheer you up or provide support. We are an encyclopedia. When an editor removes material from articles and otherwise disrupts the project, their account is blocked to prevent further disruption. That is what happened to your account.
 * The only way to get your account unblocked is to show that you understand the rules and guidelines, and that you are willing and capable of following them. A properly-constructed unblock request isn't required, but it helps. So does waiting more than a week after your block. (The "standard offer" suggests waiting six months before requesting an unblock.)
 * In all candor, your posts this morning have probably done more to hurt your chances of being unblocked than helped them. —C.Fred (talk) 04:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Ok here the deal if you unblock me right now+new administration enforcement rules.
I will stop the editing which is a major concern plus the administration should not be that strictly about users and block. Because there one major concern about those administration is BLOCK AND IP ADDRESS ABUSE. Because if administration fails to comply within those rules will be punishment and there are 3 punishable for that: 1. Removal of the administration and be blocked within the IP located 2. Banned from Wikipedia 3.Deletion of account.

Because there is some administration is abusing their power onto a new users account and making fun of them. Please stay aware of those administration and report it to me or the Wikipedia administration if they broke those written rules. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 04:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Granted to be unblocked
This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
 * Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
 * Read our guide to improving articles
 * Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
 * If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
 * Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
 * Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
 * do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:  );
 * do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this:  Name.jpg );
 * do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:  );
 * do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:  );
 * Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: ) the copied content but do not save yet ;
 * Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [ [exact Name of Article]] ; see that article's history for attribution."
 * You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose:  . Once you have added the template, click.
 * Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
 * When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
 * If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "" to your talk page. Thank you. Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 04:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Help me
Benjaminzyg9402 (talk) 04:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * We can't help with that. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  05:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Talkpage access revoked
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Yunshui 雲 <sub style="font-size:90%">水 10:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 22:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)