User talk:Benjifriedman

Dealing with vandalism
Hello, sorry to bombard you with messages, but if you find vandalism, like you did at Arabian Peninsula, the correct way to deal with it is to go to the page history and revert it. You might have to go quite far back in some cases, like you would have at the Alcatraz Versus the Evil Librarians article. Speaking of reversion, I'm just letting you know that some of your edits have been reverted due to overlinking (though some of the links were helpful). See the Manual of Style on linking. Also, deleting comments from your own talk page is OK per the guidelines but not encouraged. Graham 87 01:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * No worries. However, you're lucky that I noticed your message because you wrote it on my user page rather than the correct place, my user talk page. When you write a message on Wikipedia, remember to sign it with four tildes like this: "~". Graham 87 05:49, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caffe Strada (June 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mori Calliope fan was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caffe Strada and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Caffe Strada, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Caffe_Strada Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mori_Calliope_fan&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Caffe_Strada reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Mori Calliope fan   talk   21:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Caffe Strada
Hello, Benjifriedman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Caffe Strada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Caffe Strada


Hello, Benjifriedman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Caffe Strada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

List of fictional deities
Hello, Benjifriedman! Thanks for your edits at List of fictional deities. I have reverted the Magic: The Gathering one, because previous discussions here and here recommended to limit the list to notable entries. Otherwise there's the risk of deletion of the list alltogether based on being WP:INDISCRIMINATE. As far as I could see, this would have limited the Magic: The Gathering entries to Avacyn only. I am not really familiar with that, but in a quick search I have always seen Avacyn called an archangel or something comparable, but not a deity. If you think she should count as one, I invite you to restore Avacyn, but provide a source for the status as a deity. Otherwise it would could as WP:Original research. Thanks! Daranios (talk) 11:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Daranios, it's kind of tricky, I'm ok with it either way and someone might have a stronger opinion. Avacyn fulfills a lot of the qualities of a deity (there is "The Church of Avacyn") but is ultimately "just" an (arch)angel. But then again on the plane of Innistrad there are no "gods" exactly, so she represents "ultimate good", but also, was created by a vampire, which doesn't sound god-like. Benji (talk) 18:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Participants in the discussion were pretty insistent that they "don't want the list to be made up of entries so disparate in nature that the term "deity" essentially becomes an equivocation." Based on that, as "deity" in fiction is not very clearly defined, I think we as editor should not make a decision. I think we should only add cases where a primary or secondary source can be found which calls the entity in question a deity, goddess, god. That's my take on that at least. Daranios (talk) 11:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * For sure. I limited it to entities I definitely thought could be considered deities but can see / agree that Avacyn is kind of a gray area. There are many more "gods" in Magic the Gathering also! I just came across the page and saw the whole game was missing so wanted to add it to some extent. Benji (talk) 16:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)