User talk:Benjwong/Archive 7

Special state-to-state relations
G'day Benjwong. Just a heads-up to let you know I've nominated the "special state-to-state relations" article for deletion because I don't think inclusion in a template means a term is notable. Nevertheless, I welcome your contributions; sometimes, an AfD is what it takes to find out why an article is notable. —Felix the Cassowary 14:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Bryan Chan
You should not remove the deletion template from the article's page until the deletion discussion has been closed. J04n(talk page) 01:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought you just need a reference to prove notability. Benjwong (talk) 03:11, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Once an article for deletion discussion begins it should be allowed to reach its conclusion, which normally takes 7 days. I believe what you are thinking about is a proposed deletion. I realize that the similarity can be confusing. Either way, good work finding a reference for the article. J04n(talk page) 10:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2010 Dawu fire


The article 2010 Dawu fire has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not pass the notability guideline for events. Violates Wikipedia is not a newspaper.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 21:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1997TVBbroadcastHandover1.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:1997TVBbroadcastHandover1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:37, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1997TVBbroadcastHandover2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:1997TVBbroadcastHandover2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. –flodded ☃ (gripe)  06:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry you must have the wrong user. Benjwong (talk) 06:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to two votes
Dear Benjwong, I have noticed that you have spent some time helping with the article "2011 Chinese protests". Therefore I would like to inform you about two votes going on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2011_Chinese_protests http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/China's_2011_crackdown_on_dissidents#China.27s_2011_crackdown_on_dissidents
 * "Vote for renaming article to "Chinese Jasmine Revolution"" at the bottom of the page
 * AfD for the article

Thank you very much for your valued opinion! Best, Waikiki lwt (talk) 07:38, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

3RR

 * Since you've reverted twice on People's Liberation Army Air Force, I'm pretty sure you know the drill by now and I'll do away with the 3RR template. So please be a gentlemen and stop at WP:1RR (read also WP:Revert only when necessary), less animosity between you and others that way, okay? Best. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 17:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you are just seeing the old revert before we agreed on where to put it. Benjwong (talk) 18:03, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Had I not step in and clarify things up between you and Benlisquare on the above-mentioned matter, where do you think you guys would be heading towards? FYI, he was under the stress of editing and was told by me to go cool off until he is more calmed down. Makes a no-brainer as to what could have happened, eh? Cheers~! -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 18:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Arilang1234 at Boxer Rebellion
Arilang1234 has been doing Canvassing, deliberately asking editors whom I have had disputes with- User:John Smith's and User:Smallchief

I request neutral editors like you engage in the discussion as well, to offset his canvassing. (you have argued before with him on the talk page of the article about his vandalism)ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ (talk) 17:57, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Its at this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Racist.2C_Cold_War_style_combative.2C_and_disruptive_behavior_of_user_.CE.94.CE.A5.CE.9D.CE.93.CE.91.CE.9D.CE.95_on_talkpage_of_Boxer_Rebellion. ANI thread]ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

False Accusations by Arilang1234 against me, check it out and confirm it at ANI
I counted at least 2 false accusations by Arilang1234 against me which you can easily take a look at (meaning its not muddled up or confused with random edits). #1 Arilang1234 claims I did not respond to Smallchief- I did #2 Arilang1234 claims I did not respond to John smith's concern about neutrality- I did

This is not just an ordinary mistake, or slip up by Arilang1234. My response to Smallchief and John Smith's was right there in plain english- and Arilang1234 deliberately went into the edit history to select and post specific edits I made before I responded, to make sure users were unable to see that I did respond to their concerns later. If he had posted a direct link to the section as it is now, all the users would have been able to seen my responsesΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ (talk) 18:29, 22 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi I don't know if I can help you solve disputes regarding other editors. There seems to be way too many comments made in the past months. This is a rare case where you and Arilang have too many sources. If it was me, I would keep that boxer rebellion to the most basic minimum and split detailed-info to smaller articles. I don't think anyone should be banned. It is one difficult topic to be entirely neutral. Benjwong (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

This dispute is only days old and consisted of one section
This isn't really about content. Its about half baked conspiracy theories Arilang1234 tried to bring up on the talk page, and then proceeded to file the ANI after it was pointed out that Arilang1234 was trolling.

Arilang1234 having a go at his POV pushing on the boxer rebellion article, claiming the content in the article is from "chinese high school text book", when not a single chinese or communist source was used in the article.

look at the section now- Talk:Boxer_Rebellion

report I made on his edits- he tries to link the black panthers, marxists, and vietnam war to anti imperialism on the boxer rebellion= User:ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ/Report ANI

Arilang1234 attempting wikilawyering and making threats when he was caught trolling

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Racist.2C_Cold_War_style_combative.2C_and_disruptive_behavior_of_user_.CE.94.CE.A5.CE.9D.CE.93.CE.91.CE.9D.CE.95_on_talkpage_of_Boxer_Rebellion. After his trolling on the Boxer rebellion talk page, Arilang1234 proceeded to file this ANI report complaining about me after I criticized him for his attempt at linking marxists, black panthers, and vietnam war to the Boxer rebels...]ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ (talk) 00:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I think the views presented by Arilang is understandable. Maybe add an article like Domestic and International response to the Boxer Rebellion and list every possible view. Then slim the article down to the minimum.  There are so many views regarding this event, after all it involved like 9 countries. Benjwong (talk) 02:33, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:LegendaryAxeII1.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LegendaryAxeII1.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Notification of WP:AN/EW report
Hello Benjwong,

This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard.

If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them. ~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 06:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)

Carelessly reverting others edits
Next time you undo my edits try to be a little more discerning, You wanted to revert my deletion of the section about ghosts causing suicides at Foxxcon, but you carelessly reverted all of my other edits as well. You have done this to me more than once before. It's sloppy and more than a little bit annoying. Please do not do this anymore Metal.lunchbox (talk) 18:02, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Hong Kong meetup
You're invited to the next Hong Kong meetup on Friday 22 July 2011! It'd be great to see you there. Deryck C. 17:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Manila hostage crisis
Thanks for updating the article. It would be great if you read the contents of the sources correctly, and write with correct grammar and correct citation syntax -.

Also, the next Hong Kong meetup is on 19 August: Meetup/Hong Kong/56. Deryck C. 07:24, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Kinnikuman.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kinnikuman.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:31, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Goldenharvest.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goldenharvest.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sir Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  12:42, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Foxconn article - Sacred burial ground
Hi, I have challenged the addition of the Sacred Burial Ground section in Foxconn once again, and I'd appreciate your input on the matter. Refer to Talk:Foxconn/Archives/2014 Facugaich (talk) 05:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Responding on talkpage. Benjwong (talk) 21:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumbini, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''You are consistently reverting edits in this page. While your arguments might be justified, the references you cite are not trustable as most of them are blogs and not the UN official website that I have cited which clearly states that the deal was signed. Please do not engage in edit reverts again and take your discussion to the talk page.

Thanks.'' DBhuwanSurfer 22:34, 25 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DBSSURFER (talk • contribs)

Communist culture?
Greetings. Do you know anything about this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Culture_of_the_People's_Republic_of_China#Childlike_edits. I would be interested in your response to my question, posed on the page. I see your name popping up a lot in the History and Talk pages. Greetings. --Bstephens393 (talk) 00:34, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:36, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:RomanTamCD.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:RomanTamCD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:47, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marry girl cake
The deletion of an article you created, Marry girl cake, has been proposed for the following reason:


 * Unreferenced

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   19:48, 11 November 2011 (UTC)