User talk:Benlisquare/Archive 4

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Umlaut&diff=prev&oldid=491389455
Calm down, dear! Calm down! I think that you might just be a little wrong, there! The Umlaut is most definitely also used, beside German, in the Finnish and the Hungarian, if not also the Swedish and the Estonian, languages, as well as upon (on) the Dictionaries of the Faroese and the Icelandic languages. (and your English is not exactly cut-glass, either, mate! and neither do I, I suppose!) — KC9TV 08:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * First of all, sure, the diaeresis diacritic is used in German, as well as Turkish, Icelandic, et cetera. However, they are not called "umlaut" in any other language apart from German. Saying that they "mark umlaut" in Turkish is a definite factual error, as the diaeresis is only used to mark umlaut (that is, an I-mutation) in German. The same diacritic has as different purpose in other languages. Furthermore, have a read at the edit in question: "used, among other languages in German to mark umlaut". Does this make sense in the English language at all? --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 11:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * So did I, come to think of it, I suppose. A bit of the "T.L.D.R.". Well, I do pray and hope that my subsequent intervention is to your satisfaction, Sir. I rest, your servant. — KC9TV 13:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Scarborough is fun
Could I IAR on 3RR due to the, well, absolutely blatant POV pushing? I am sorely tempted. I wonder if the newest user somehow feels that having a European username makes his POV less POV... CMD (talk) 14:44, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't risk it, he could be baiting you. Corner him with policy, don't let him corner you out of your own frustration. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 15:22, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Bo Xilai
Hi Ben! Would appreciate your comment on the inclusion of certain details concerning Falun Gong in the above article. Cheers, -- Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 15:45, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Input
Look at One Sonic Society, and tell me what you think of it now?HotHat (talk) 21:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Croation writer again
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Croation writer spamming again. Thank you.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Testing IPv6
Benlisquare here, Testing ipv6 2001:5C0:1000:A:0:0:0:AA7 (talk) 16:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * HOREY SHET, IT WORKS --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 16:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * HELL YEAH, IPv6 2001:5C0:1000:A:0:0:0:AA7 (talk) 16:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I also know that you're using a tunnelbroker.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:12, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hehehe. My ISP doesn't seem to support IPv6 at the moment. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 16:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Personally, I'd use a Hurricane Electric tunnel instead if possible (I know that's using gogo6, like myself).--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:16, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, just remembered, my university supports IPv6. I don't need a tunnel to view http://ipv6.2chan.net/54/futaba.htm whilst on campus. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 16:24, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Test IPv6 2002:89DB:68C8:0:0:0:89DB:68C8 (talk) 01:19, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * mou ikkai 2001:C08:3700:FFFF:0:0:0:D33 (talk) 08:07, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.--v/r - TP 23:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

SPI report
Hello, just as a heads-up, somebody filed a strange SPI report about you and apparently didn't notify you. Nothing to worry about; I've closed it as rather obviously non-actionable. Please let me know if you want anything else done about it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm in China at the moment. Access to Wikipedia and the internet in general will be iffy for me in the next few weeks. Right now I'm using HTTPS fine, but if Tor, VPN and closed proxies don't work for any reason, I won't be contactable unless via email (Special:EmailUser or whatever it's called). --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 15:54, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Having a look at what he's written, I'd just like to add a few things: Do as you see fit, --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 16:09, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not rocket science that I am 220.245.209.35 when I am in Canberra, Australia. My userpage even mentions it. I don't see how this violates any rules. No disruptive editing was conducted using that IP whilst not logged in.
 * I use IP addresses when I want to report a 4chan raid and don't want to reveal my Wikipedia username/identity, for obvious reasons. I say this at WP:ANI all the time, and I do this at WP:ANI all the time. Having my username show up when teenage internet warriors from /b/ show up is just idiotic. I see this as a borderline attempt to "out" me, but I'll assume good faith for now and ignore it.

回家了？

 * 好好休息、好好玩，可别玩的太疯哦~！ 祝好. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 16:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 哈哈，谢谢. . . 很久没有回国了，6年的变化看起来很大！ Also, finally found an open proxy that works, before Wikipedia would 404 on me all the time randomly for no reason, hitting F5 all the time was killing me, 囧rz. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 13:52, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Chinese numbered policies
Heads up. Bearian (talk) 22:34, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Commons help
I need to transfer some county maps from ZH-Wiki over to Commons so some county articles don't remain "off the map", per se, so could you enlighten me on this process? Not to sound lazy, but I am busy with other edits and want to finish a new 乡级行政区 list or two before term starts again. GotR Talk 04:40, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, and how is winter recess going? BTW, I've seen some Southern Hemisphere climate sections here on Wiki remind Northern Hemispher-er's that the seasons are "opposite"&mdash;am absolutely appalled that we have to do that!


 * The Move-to-Commons assistant seems quite buggy lately, it never worked the last few times I've tried to use it, and I've had to move images to commons manually. What's supposed to happen is that a bot moves the file to commons for you, once you get a TUSC account, but it doesn't seem to work anymore. There are three CommonsHelper assistants, and they are here (magnus), here (richs), and here (commmonshelper2). --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 04:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much! I would like you to comment here on how to deal with these pests that come regularly when there is no semi. GotR Talk 16:21, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Get out of /jp/
No, really. Japanese Bird (talk) 20:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Quality post, would read again. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 02:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Zh-wiki
see, there is no way to save an edit immediatley TheChampionMan1234 01:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)


 * http://imgur.com/RUWXZ (see link for image)
 * Uhh... come again? Like I said, either your settings are wrong, you're an untrusted (non-autoconfirmed) user, or something else. I have never ever seen a preview page on ZHwiki in my entire life. In actual fact, I never use the preview button on any Wikipedia, which is quite a bad habit of mine, and sometimes makes quite a few people upset. But that's a story for another day. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 01:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

IPBE removed
Hello, Benlisquare. A few months ago, TParis granted you an IP Block Exemption for you to use while you were traveling. He left me a note to remove it after July; it appears from a quick peek using checkuser that you are indeed back home, so I have removed your IPBE flag. This should not affect normal editing, however if you do find yourself unable to edit please post an unblock request and point administrators to this message. Hope your trip went well. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:23, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

您好，能帮个忙吗？
对于SVG实在不懂，希望阁下能吧者两张图片矢量化. 这里第一张第二张，让后分开上传一个用在enwiki一个zhwiki. --Qa003qa003 (talk) 04:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * 现在比较不方便，我电脑上没装Inkscape，最近也比较忙. Sorry! --  李博杰   &#124; —Talk contribs email 10:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

re
Pro. Li Huang's disruptive behaviour is similar to zh:WP:LHLS and zh:WP:GZIP. -- Makecat  Talk  13:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

South Korea
Can not understand why it was deleted. It also expressly source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous sensible (talk • contribs) 11:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipediaの方針によると、攻撃の言葉（”touted the false education”）は禁止、編集戦争も禁止. 貴方の編集は中立じゃない. --  李博杰   &#124; —Talk contribs email 11:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

メッセージありがとうございます. (Thank you for your message.) 言葉の攻撃ではなく事実と違う記載があったので事実を記載しただけです. (Simply described the facts because there was not the case rather than the attack described in words.) wikiの影響力は強いので、私は事実が記載されている事を望みます. (Because the strong influence of the wiki, I hope that the facts have been described.) あなたにも手伝っていただければ幸いです. (It would be greatly appreciated if it could help you too.) 私の示したソースを見て下さい. (Please look at the source of my shows.) --Anonymous sensible (talk) 12:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)


 * 事実は日本人の視点と韓国人の視点同じではありません、でも、それはインターネットの競合を扇動の理由じゃない. ＷｉｋｉｐｅｄｉａのWP:NPOV方針無視することはできません、百科事典の内容絶対に中立的な観点を含める. 貴方の視点僕分かる：貴方は韓国人が疑わしいでしょう？だけど、Ｗｉｋｉｐｅｄｉａのルールに従う必要があります. 他の人の間で合意を得る必要があります. 事前に他の人と議論する(Talk:South Korea). 相互理解があり、その後articleを編集することができます. 対話を通して、貴方の意見を述べることができる. --  李博杰   &#124; —Talk contribs email 12:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

私もあなたの仰る事は大変よくわかります. (What you say is I know very well also.) 私のような新参者に手助けを頂きましてありがとうございます. (Thank you for helping a newcomer like me.) ただ、現在の記述が中立的で公平であるとはどうしても思えませんでした. (but I do not think it was a fair description has been made neutral.） (Talk:South Korea)の件、早速試して見ました. (I give this a try to (Talk South Korea). これからもご協力頂ければ幸いです. (I hope for your cooperation in the future.) 私の主張をあなたが理解して下さった事を本当に嬉しくに思っています. (I think to really glad that you understand my assertion.) 本当にありがとうございます. (Thank you very much.) --Anonymous sensible (talk) 14:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

POV pushing at Prostitution in the People's Republic of China
There is a Korean user who calls himself User:Chinese-proti. All of his edits consist of making Korea look good (downplaying korean prostitution to foreign men), while trying to defame China by calling china the biggest exporter of women (and he deliberately inserts the word "local men" as if to emphasize korean prostitutes get f***d only by korean men while chinese women are whoring to everyone).

His english is horrible and apparently he is so embarassed by the paragraph on north korean women whoring themselves in china that he keeps on adding the claim that most of their clients are ethnic korean citizens of china pn both the articles about prostitution in china and north korea.

one of his edits summaries actualy says this- not a joke- "Korean women`s customers in foreign countries are mostly Korean men"Mitoese (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

i suggest you place the articles about prostitution in china, north korea, and south korea on your watchlist, because this guy is persistent in dissapearing for a few months and then showing up again to add his trash attacks on the articles. Look at his contribution history.Mitoese (talk) 22:32, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Can you make a page on NSJ
The Internet needs to be informed on this pressing issue 67.5.239.19 (talk) 01:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No, not really. I'm actually in favour of more stricter moderation so, you know, people can actually talk about Otaku Culture. Daily dick threads are not "board culture", no matter how hard you force it. Hence, I'm unable to write something about "NSJ" for you. You probably have better chance convincing your IRC friends to write it for you. Ganbatte! --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 01:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

NSJ you piece of shit
We know that's you. Stop shitting up /jp/ and posting shit about it on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.57.21.33 (talk • contribs)
 * I don't understand your logic, IRC squad. If I was "NSJ", then why would I need to report your shitposts, when I could delete them myself as a janitor? I'm obviously not 4chan staff, and I've only applied for janitorhood once, and that was on /int/ back when /new/ just got deleted, and obviously I wasn't successful, otherwise I wouldn't be talking about it right now (4chan.org/rules: declaring janitor is immediate grounds for dismission). --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 09:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Paraloco
Bro I'm a Chinese, born and raised in the Netherlands but with roots from Shanghai. A lot of this page on anti-Chinese sentiments only incites more hatred against Chinese and, in my opinion, should be deleted. But since one man can't change the whole system I'm just adjusting parts of it to make a small difference. I hope u understand bro, just looking out for my Asian peeps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paraloco (talk • contribs) 14:33, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I understand what you're trying to say, however keep in mind that editors on Wikipedia are here to contribute towards encyclopedia-building, and not nation-defending. Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia which will contain content that you will like, and content that you will dislike; that doesn't mean that one can delete content that you don't like. As long as content adheres to the core Wikipedia policies, such as WP:RS, WP:V, WP:N, WP:NPOV, WP:OR, et cetera, there is no need to delete it. There is process on Wikipedia regarding how things are handled, and doing things different from standard procedure is somewhat disruptive towards the entire system. If everyone was allowed to delete things they don't like, then we wouldn't have Wikipedia anymore - Japanese would delete Anti-Japanese sentiment, Muslims would delete Zionism, white supremacists would delete race mixing, AKB48 fans would delete SNSD, Nintendo fans would delete PlayStation 3, Americans would delete every single article on the FIFA World Cup because they're always losing, and no articles would be left. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 14:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

South China Sea - Re:Derogatory comments to editors

 * Stop your verbal insults. Your labeling / "name-calling" of editors with such derogatory words like "mindless", "centric" in the edit summary reflects unprofessionalism and violates journalism ethics. Your derogatory statements will not be tolerated:

(cur | prev) 22:36, September 16, 2012‎ Benlisquare (talk | contribs)‎. . (29,568 bytes) (+22)‎. . (revert: Benlisquare WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT with two other editors, mindless Filipino-POV centric... FTSantos ©Bot 06:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabyan17 (talk • contribs)
 * I suppose the English language is a difficult point for you. There is a difference between calling someone something, and saying that their actions/edits are something. Your edits are mindless and Filipino-POV centric, anyone can see that, and there's no fancy-pantsy way to sugar-coat that. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 07:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Admin Noticeboard/Incidents
Hi User:Benlisquare. You are hereby courteously notified that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank You FTSantos ©Bot 09:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabyan17 (talk • contribs)

DYK for Tibetan Army
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:04, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Mousetext
Hi, I'm Dodoïste from the WikiProject Accessibility. I requested the deletion of Template:Mousetext. This template was often used in a way that produces accessibility issues. And in the good cases it was a duplicate of the abbr template. Please use the latter template in the future. If you're interested to know the details of the accessibility issues, I'd be glad to explain.

This request has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cheers, Dodoïste (talk) 23:31, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notification. I've redirected the template to Abbr since it's pretty much the same template; if you don't think this is a good idea, feel free to revert. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 03:13, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It's a good idea, sure. :-) Thanks for your quick understanding. Cheers, Dodoïste (talk) 10:18, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Please report this sockpuppet
User_talk:Shrigley

LLtimes is not acting on this so someone who knows how to report it should..Jaabaat (talk) 06:35, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

List of wars involving the People's Republic of China
Thanks for contributing. But I don't think most of the conflicts you added to the table is considered 'wars'. Hope you don't mind if I move them to the "See also"-section. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 17:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

The U-users
I pasted some arbitrary parts of 's edits to Japanese opium policy in Taiwan (1895–1945) and into Google and didn't notice anything, so there is a possibility that they're not the same person as. However, there's almost certainly some relation between them--possibly a class assignment of some sort? I'm not sure how to handle this though... wctaiwan (talk) 12:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * A giant chunk of text really arouses my suspicions, especially since every single paragraph is cited by the exact same reference. That reference has a paywall (requires it to be purchased for $29.95 in order to be viewed), but my impression is that if the user has pasted a huge chunk of copyvio text elsewhere, what are the chances that another huge chunk of text isn't a copyvio? --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 12:58, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe. But the last time I saw a bunch of similar numerical usernames it ended up being a class project. If it's just a regular sock who can be reverted easily then there's little issue, but we'd have a problem if they have many accounts, are posting at a wide range of articles or actually turn out to be a group of people. I think I'll defer to your judgement, though. It's not worth it for me to get worked up over it so long as they're not POV-warring at Taiwan or something. wctaiwan (talk) 14:18, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Could you add the strength info to the battle of yultong page?
The amount of strength of each of the forces is said here: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/225235/filipino-soldiers-story-of-korean-war-valor-redux

Additional Piece of info: Go to the part of the article named "Wounded in action". — Preceding unsigned comment added by SoaringSkies.V. (talk • contribs) 04:54, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * That article specifically says that the author is a self-designated "historian" from www.peftok.blogspot.com. Furthermore, this "story" makes no sense, because the 44th Division never had more than 20,000 troops (40,000 in a division is outright illogical, and is one of the most stupidest things I've ever read), and it's foolish to obtain information from personal accounts rather than official figures due to obvious reasons. If you can find a veteran who "claims" he killed 500 soldiers, I too can "claim" that I've slept with 12 Saudi Arabian princesses. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 05:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I put a detailed analysis of the source on the Talk:Battle of Yultong. Jim101 (talk) 14:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Socotra Rock
You posted some pictures related Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. It's good work. Do you have any pictures related the Socotra Rock? Do you know Taiwan (ROC) policy of the island?--Syngmung (talk) 07:47, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Nobody really talks about Socotra Rock - it's a dispute, but it's quite beneath the radar. It is barely mentioned or discussed, in both mainland China and Taiwan, and isn't as big of an issue compared to the disputes relating to Baekdu mountain, Senkaku islands, Liancourt Rocks, Kuril islands, et cetera. Officially, the ROC on Taiwan pursues its "official" territorial claims as described here, which mostly overlaps with the claims of the PRC, but I'm quite sure in reality the ROC doesn't have an active policy towards Socotra Rock - it's more of a mainland issue, since it's too far away from Taiwan for there to be any effective or reasonable dispute. It's the same reason why Taiwan hasn't made any loud statements regarding Baekdu mountain, Aksai Chin or South Tibet, despite the ROC "officially" claiming its territory within its 1912 map borders. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 08:10, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks useful imformation. I see. Socotra Rock issue is mostly self disputed by South Korea. yes it is not island. ROC is unstable nation, so they dont strongly claim sovereignty over Baekdu mountain, Tibet, Aksai Chin, North Mongolia.. But Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands is very short distance, so ROC claims their sovereignty.--Syngmung (talk) 14:56, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

You Exist On WP By The Bad Graces Of Apathy
I simply can not underastand how your obvious trolling, obvious immaturity, and overall bad nature is continued to be tolerated. I can only summize that those with the ability to put you in place or otherwise deal with you punitively are too apathetic, or too tied up with petty and idealistic sparring with other folk. But do you honestly expect a mature and intelligent person NOT to think you're simply a troll or a troublemaker? I admit, I sometimes look at your history for "the lolz," as most of what you say and contribute is either absurd, or meant to be inflammatory. Jersey John (talk) 15:49, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Also, Wikipedia, at least in principle, is far above any sort of image board childishness. You should probably keep that in mind when you start ranting about what people are doing on 4chan (or some other ridiculous cesspool of immaturity), and not have it spill over to WM or color your perceptions of people here, nor should you have it influence in how you deal with other users and contributors, NOR should you have it slant your views or generalize whole races or nationalities (as you have done in the past). If it has that effect on you, then keep it out of WM. That is simply asinine. Jersey John (talk) 15:57, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong disagree. Per Future Perfect at Sunrise T. trichiura Infect me 18:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

谢谢提醒
rt. 不过试了之后才发现自己英语水平还是有限. 写着写着语法错误就写出来了. --水樹美月 (talk) 14:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for you copyediting!一不小心在英文版挖了坑，只好尽力把它填满了……对了：

破壊ここに歓迎されていません.

→ここでの荒らしはご遠慮ください. 似乎更合适？

--水樹美月 (talk) 17:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * 谢谢. 很久没有修改那个editnotice，我完全忘记这个玩意儿存在. . . --  李博杰   &#124; —Talk contribs email 17:13, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Supporting GAN! Consider reviewing today! :)
I've noticed you're interested in supporting GA! :) That is fantastic.  Please consider reviewing a Good Article nominee to help in the 450+ article review backlog! :)  Your assistance and support of Good Article is appreciated. :) Clearing the backlog is important in terms of recognising quality work by Wikipedia's contributors! --LauraHale (talk) 03:40, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

New medical organization
Hi I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page. Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders. Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 21:15, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Yang Kyoungjong
Hello! I've noticed that in the korean wiki Yang Kyoungjong is described as a fictional character. I wonder if there are any sources that can confirm that? (Or it's just an original and wrong research, as I think)--Fastboy (talk) 15:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The Korean Wikipedia article is a complete mess, and is full of original research and uncited statements. One of the references the Korean article uses even refers to geocities webpages and internet forum posts for "source information". That Korean Wikipedia article is also full of speculation and personal analysis ("It could be possible that... it is likely that...") Per WP:OR, please do not introduce information translated from the Korean Wikipedia. I noticed in the Russian Wikipedia you included information about children - this is completely unsourced and original research, as is the date of birth. There are currently no reliable sources about his date of birth. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 15:34, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks for the answer. I'll review the sources once again.--Fastboy (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Sealle (talk) 09:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Is there any way that you could get the Hanja for him, or a Japanese name? (I don't think that the Hangul is useful, since there's usually a 1:1 correspondence between Hangul and romanization.) Shrigley (talk) 15:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure, I've tried looking for his name in Hanja, but haven't found anything. Hangul-to-Hanja isn't a 1:1 conversion, I'm sure we all know, and we need to find the name that matches the right person. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 15:58, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

mainland China vs China
While I agree with you wanting to allow "mainland China" to be used, I have to object to your sarcastic comment about "What's even more shocking, the meteorology department of the National Taiwan University has been infiltrated by evil nationalists with a pro-unification agenda as well! " In fact a university receiving government funds (I assume NTU does) would not want to upset their benefactors. Add to this the long lasting institutional bias that likely arose when the wealthier nationalists were more able to send their kids there, as well as staffing that likely came from nationalists. In short, if I were to guess I would say that NTU would have a bias in favor of the Nationalist position both for historical reasons and for reasons of current government funding. I think that was a poor example to choose for the point you are trying to make. Readin (talk) 19:25, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I see then, didn't look that much into it. Though, does it really make a difference? What if the DPP was in power - wouldn't universities likewise recieve government funding? --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 19:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes and I would expect them to move in a direction of less bias in favor of the KMT, with some professors even being willing to buck the trend and publicly support the DPP. But I think it would take a lot of time for the ingrained institutional biases to disappear completely. Readin (talk) 20:00, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Yang Kyoungjong
Yngvadottir (talk) 08:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

"there is no "patcho" in hepburn romaji"
(talking about ) Can you elaborate on this, please? Did I misunderstand the article or is it wrong? —HigherFive (t &#124; c) 14:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I got it wrong... My bad. Sorry about reverting your edit. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 00:01, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it. It looked off to me too, so I wasn't sure. —HigherFive (t &#124; c) 01:27, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Mess
What can we do to undo the mess created by Fizikanauk? 14.0.208.107 (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

3rd party opinion request
Hey Benlisquare, there's a debate here on the Talk:Chengdu J-20 page as to whether or not it is a 'purported' or actual 5th-generation stealth fighter. The citation numerous authors have used seems to be unclear on this and I'm concerned 'purported' is a weasel word. I don't want to run afoul of 3RR, so please check in, thanks. If you find purported to be a weasel word, feel free to edit it out of the first sentence on the Chengdu J-20 page.

Lostromantic (talk) 07:33, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism to your user page
Since you were most likely asleep at the time, I have requested semi, and defer to you as whether to make it indefinite. Happy studying, GotR Talk 19:39, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 02:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Hsu Mo
Thank you for your edits on Hsu Mo. Not much for number of characters, but a clear improvement. I was happy to see some one from WikiProject China look at it so quickly. IMHO (talk) 05:31, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

test
testing — Preceding unsigned comment added by XXxKing CrimsonxXx (talk • contribs) 17:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Concerning Jros83
Hello, I noticed that Jros83 (also known as "Jersey John") was not acting in good faith towards you on Talk:Sinosphere. I have been watching him act like this for quite some time. Do you think that any actions should be taken? (seeing his warning history & "contributions") Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia ChaseAm (talk) 22:39, 29 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Well isn't this interesting. Witchhunt? Calm down, both of you, and Benlisquare, your recent stunt is borderline criminal and if you do anything like that again, I will be in touch with authorities with a bit more power than facebook admins. And Chase, seriously, don't witchhunt. Jersey John (talk) 01:49, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * First of all, it's not my fault that you're not too bright about securing your own internet privacy. I'm not the idiot that puts my real name on my Flickr profile, and then displays all Facebook statuses publicly for everyone to see. I mean, Facebook has issued numerous warnings to users already regarding account privacy, ignoring them is your own problem. You don't have anyone else to blame apart from yourself - it's like gloating to everyone of your new expensive TV, putting it out on the front porch, going to sleep, and then complaining after someone's stolen it.


 * Secondly, Wikipedia has a policy prohibiting legal threats - see WP:LEGAL. If you continue making legal threats (even for things that aren't illegal, like using this wonderful marvel called "Google"), you may find yourself banned.


 * Finally, You don't really seem to think that there's any repercussions to trashtalking to everyone on the internet all the time, do you? None of this wouldn't happened if you were bright enough to think before typing, especially when 99% of the comments you write on Wikipedia talk pages are completely unnecessary commentary. Having a look at your Wikipedia contributions, you have made zero useful contributions to mainspace, and the only thing you do is trashtalk other people on talk pages when you disagree with someone's opinion. I get the feeling that you are not here to help with building an encyclopedia, and are merely using this place to pick keyboard warrior fights, or use as a forum. You have said nothing so far that is even remotely beneficial to the Wikipedia project, so don't start crying foul when you get treated with tit-for-tat diplomacy. Have a look at the things you are saying to others - not just me, but everyone here. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 07:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * ::You both need to stop and let this go. You are both being as unconstructive and petty as I have ever been. Chase I have a feeling youre sensible enough but please be aware that Benli is simply having fun creating more drama and it would be a shame if one such as you were dragged into it. As far as I am concerned this issue is over with. Chase I have made clear my personal position towards you and I hope you see it is genuine and as for you Benli I'll stay away from you, you stay away from me. That is the BEST course of action, and if you insist on keeping this crap going then it can only be construed as you being malicious. This is done and over with. Regards to all. Jersey John (talk) 14:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Could you please comment on Talk:Thought_identification
Re: John Norseen and Lockheed Martin

I'm beside myself trying to update information that I believe to be very relevent. It looks to me like several users who "hang out" at "ANI:Fringe" are working together to remove well sourced, valid, on topic material which shows the state of military research into thought identification. Outside comments would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Damonthesis (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Please attention on the Wokou page
Hello Benlisquare. I want your attentions on the Wokou page. The page is now blocked to me — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.254.33.28 (talk) 10:04, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

WP:COMMON discussion
Because of your participation on Talk:Sinosphere, please check out Talk:Adoption of Chinese literary culture, which is about the dispute over the concept's WP:COMMON name.--Ross Monroe (talk) 21:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Shame on you!
Just like other people from China you also support self-censorship, even you had already moved to other country, shame on you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.118.249.186 (talk) 04:17, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Don't you fucking "shame" me, buddy. Wikipedia is not the place for you to astroturf, you can take your shitty drama elsewhere, preferably back to Chinese Wikipedia, we don't want your silly, childish drama over here on the English Wikipedia.


 * The English Wikipedia has policies prohibiting original research, and what constitutes reliable sources. Your edits are in conflict with Wikipedia policy, regardless of how "correct" and "noble" you think your cause may be. Personally, I frankly don't even give a shit about your little rivalry with certain Chinese Wikipedia users, but you cannot expect to be allowed to take your dumb rivalry into English Wikipedia articles.


 * "Naming and shaming" users is looked down upon outside of WP:ANI, it's bad-faith behaviour. Furthermore, you're not helping your silly cause anyway; the Chinese Wikipedia has different policies and guidelines, and nobody from the English Wikipedia can do anything about it. You're better off complaining at meta.wikimedia.org as opposed to extending your stupid rivalry over here.


 * This shit has nothing to do with censorship. I don't give a shit about what little gripe you have with people over at zhwiki, and I don't give a shit about your censorship allegations, I am reverting your edits because they break the rules here, on enwiki. Fuck off with your childish accusations. I'm as much opposed to censorship in mainland China than anyone else (I repeat, I am opposed to the great firewall, government censorship, and lack of civil rights in China), however that does not mean that I can turn a blind eye to your shenanigans.


 * There is nothing wrong with me reverting your dumb, childish edits. I am upholding Wikipedia policy, and your edits do not conform with our expectations here. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 04:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Numbered policies
I read this story about Chinese numbered policies and remembered that you were the only one without a "delete" opinion on the subject. I think it's interesting that the numbered policies are supposedly based in Communist "statistics - the poster children of rationalism" and are related to ease with which one can internalize and recite policy. So, scholars like John Mason and George Wei and much more in China have studied this; we just need to find the sources... Shrigley (talk) 04:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you intend on re-creating the article, and rewriting it based on sources that you find? If I recall correctly, that article was pretty much just a "list" of things that had existing articles (e.g. Four Noes and One Without, Four Olds, etc), but if the article is remade with prose instead, I think there's enough justification to keep the article. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 05:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Occasionally I get annoyed that there's no central list of the numbered policies, so at some point I will recreate it with prose, yeah. Shrigley (talk) 05:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Redundant district names
Hi, thought you might take an interest in this discussion I've started about some redundancies in English namings of districts and might have ideas how to proceed. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 05:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

FYI...
In regards to your edit summary here, and your talk page message, the "physical release" column was hastily created in a minute or two, from memory, to help solve an issue in a related related AFD Discussion. It wasn't meant to be region-specific or purposely exclude regions or anything, just a starting point created from memory.

On a related note, when you catch differences like that, it'd be helpful if you noted in which region they are available in, (or if its easier, denote the exceptions that aren't available), as to keep it more accurate, and less region-based, as you seem to aspire to do. As you changed it, you kinda just took it from one version of wrong to another. Thanks! Sergecross73  msg me   18:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for the notice. I'll mark them as "Japan only" or something, as opposed to a simple "Yes" or "No". --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 18:14, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for adding a photo in CMS
Thanks!SummerRat (talk) 03:20, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

關於馬來
我是另外一個人，在維基只有一個account，不是馬甲. 你没有任何證據就說人家是馬甲，不覺得太武斷了嗎？

在國內，北方人經常用那些針對廣東人的slurs，你可以看這裏：

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/2330298285 汉人和马来人的区别

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/2330272141 美国驱除广东马来

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/2393586508 中国人屡次被某些马来人代表，对此我很窝火

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/2396004842 你们马来人种永远都是最低劣的 再见

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/2395837032 你们这群马来人种速来受死

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/2319082576 目测本吧，犸猍猴子似乎有想当白人的倾向？

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/909281599 南方马来猴子不光是长得丑，智商也真是低到热带黑人的水平了啊

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/1953061907 希望南方纯马来不要再生了，跟tm下仔似的

我看過你的照片，你長得很馬來，不像北方人.

John Cruel (talk) 09:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

馬來
我是廣東人，你的外貌比我還要偏馬來.

John Cruel (talk) 09:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

再贈你兩條links
http://tieba.baidu.com/p/1205145529 这个自称什么胡思龙的岭南马来猴子跑到胡吧里来捣什么乱啊

http://bbs.tianya.cn/post-5026-6463-1.shtml 大家都来声讨丧尽天良的岭南猴子吧(转载)

那些slurs是真實存在的，不是我瞎編出來的. 至於你說我是sockpuppet，我明確地回覆你，我不是.

John Cruel (talk) 11:38, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

你像廣東人
你的照片比我還要像廣東人，可以用來做廣東人的標準像.

John Cruel (talk) 11:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Holy shit, you're annoying, you know that?
 * One: I don't care. In more frank terms, I can hardly give a fuck, please stop annoying me.
 * Two: Alright, assuming that you are correct and you are not a sockpuppet, your edits are still bad. Per Wikipedia policy, edits must be backed up by reliable sources that are verifiable. Baidu Tieba is not a reliable source, and neither is Tianya. Your edits constitute original research, which is prohibited.
 * Three: Take your moonrunes elsewhere, this is the English Wikipedia, use English. You have no reason to be speaking in moonrunes unless you absolutely cannot speak in English, and I am quite certain that you are capable in English, otherwise you wouldn't have made those edits yourself (which would suggest that you are acting as a meatpuppet of someone else). Instead of trying to hide your nonsense from other editors who don't read moonrunes, spit it out properly.
 * To summarize, stop flooding my talkpage with stupid internet forum links and chinkrunes, and expect me to either a) care, or b) read any of your boring drivel. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 11:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

my English is not good
my English is not good，你總愛猜度別人，先是猜我是馬甲，然後猜我英文很好. 不幸地，你兩樣都猜錯了.

還有，那些slurs的來源我已經給你了，是你視而不見而已. 客觀存在的東西為甚麼要無視呢？

John Cruel (talk) 12:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Please leave. If your English is not good, why are you even here? Go to Chinese Wikipedia and trash the place over there, don't bring your rubbish over on my talkpage. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 12:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

bye
在我走之前，我要說最後一句話：

你心胸狹窄，䆟不下別人的意見，不會是一個好的editor

bye

John Cruel (talk) 12:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Of Malays and Monkeys
I don't think it's reasonable in the first place to have that article become a list of ethnic slurs. Sinophobia used to be like this (and I even contributed some Mongolian-language terms, which I am proud of), but somebody converted it to prose without incident. Think of it as a last resort if he gets his 南蛮 stuff in the article. Hell, I don't even think that xiao riben should be an article; the creator was likely just butthurt that jjokbari existed. Speaking of which, strange that jjangkae doesn't exist yet. I could cite myself as an expert on the uses of that word purely based on my experiences of Wikipedia. Annie, just like SPI, can be capricious and unpredictable, but I don't think she'd hurt you for bringing Isuzu or a future incarnation there. Just let me know when you do, so I can pile on to the dogpile. Shrigley (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Li
Hi, it seems like you speak Chinese. Can you link all of the different 'Li' articles to the corresponding versions in the Chinese (and if extant, vietnamese?) wikipedia? One or two are linked, but others aren't, and I'm assuming they could be. also, I took the translation from the individual pages, but if you think there's a better translation for each of those names, please suggest it. This is a special case, even Jimmy Wales basically agreed to ignore-all-rules back in 2006 and keep the character in the name. It seems the only reasonable way to disambiguate, and I really find it hard to see how the user is harmed, when we have words like Þorgerðr Hölgabrúðr and Irpa and Jón_Jósep_Snæbjörnsson. I wouldn't want this to stretch BEYOND use as a disambiguator though. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback, sort of
Really more just me somewhat long-windedly begging you for forgiveness. Diff. &mdash; TORTOISE WRATH  03:40, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

File:8-2earthquake-kanto.jpg
Hello, Mr.Ben. File:8-2earthquake-kanto.jpg Please check about the contents. The notation of Source is a graphics file. Please add photograph printing page URL to the explanation column. I would like to check the contents of a page. Moreover, quotation of Description and the dead body of a photograph should explain the reason determined as Koreans. Source does not have the statement of a reason. Who took a photograph when and where? Is the copyright unidentified? The dead body of a photograph is Korean? How was it checked?(Tomotadara (talk) 06:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC))
 * Done. The image was uploaded a few years ago, so I had to look around for the original source to fix up that image source description, but the image is from the Korean Broadcasting System, and is held within the Republic of Korea national archives. The photograph was taken before 1946 in Japan, and so falls under PD per article 23 of the old copyright law of Japan. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 03:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. Photograph description cannot be checked by the web page of KBS of the present quotation origin. I understood. In that case, I think that explanation of File Comment needs to be corrected. Because source which checks a date, a place, a photographer, and an author does not exist. A situation is a copy of an archive of the file which is visible to an old photograph. I also checked other sauce. However, only the private page and explanation of checking the photograph of the Great Kanto Earthquake and the body have been held. I was not able to find the basis whose photographic subject is Uyoku dantai. Suitable Information and Description of a file. 1923 The photograph considered to be the spot of Great Kanto earthquake. Date unknown, photography place unknown, photographer unknown, photographic subject unknown, and the archive KBS. This notation regards me as good. Although it is not suitable for Image use policy...(Tomotadara (talk) 13:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC))
 * The KBS page seems to be the oldest webpage which uses this image. All the other ones were made after the KBS one, so I shall assume that the other pages took the image from the KBS page. The image is not a full one - it is a low resolution image that is quite likely to be cropped from a much larger photograph; I've yet to find the original, however. All I have for now is the smaller-sized image from the KBS source. As for the rest of your comment, I'm finding it quite difficult to understand what you are trying to say. Are you using a machine translator to write English? 日本語でおｋ、自動翻訳機を使用しないでください. --  李博杰   &#124; —Talk contribs email 13:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Automatic translation? Please do not escape from an argument. When you record URL and the date of a Web page. Readers can carry out a source check in Internet Archive. However, you cannot indicate. Your explanation is in the state of No original research. Eliminates Verifiability. Unsuitable as a file of Wikipedia. (Tomotadara (talk) 14:57, 26 June 2013 (UTC))
 * Ugh. If you're here to pick a fight, then please leave. I was originally willing to have a decent conversation with you, but if you're going to go on like that, you may as well go talk to somebody else. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 16:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * our? Which group is it? Do you want to say that I am not a Wikipedian? You destroy Verifiability unconsciously? The written act of No original research (file explanation uyoku dantai). And the affair in which the fact statement was refused. Baseless Description and Date. Concealment Location. An attempt of Sensationalism picture use. It seems that your act is against Wikipedians. I perform the deletion request of a File. commons:Commons:DEL(Tomotadara (talk) 10:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC))
 * Fight is unnecessary. Observance of Policies_and_guidelines is required. (Tomotadara (talk) 10:46, 28 June 2013 (UTC))
 * By all means tell an administrator. I don't care, because you will most likely fail, after all you appear to have little grasp over how Wikimedia Commons policy works. If an administrator asks me to explain anything, I will, and I will do so respectfully. However, I'm not going to bother with you here on my talkpage, because I'm too tired for your silly internet fights. You don't just show up to someone's backyard and start drama like that. If you don't have the common courtesy to show respect to me, you can go and complain to somebody else. Go find an administrator. Or better, go nominate that file for deletion. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 12:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * In case that was too difficult for you to grasp: お前の英語は凄く意味をなさない. お前は失礼であり、全くマナーを示さない. ここは喧嘩の場所じゃないぞ、俺のtalkpageだ. この後、お前本当に俺が議論したいと思いますか？帰ろう.  --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 12:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

File:8-2earthquake-kanto.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:8-2earthquake-kanto.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Tomotadara (talk) 10:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Tomotadara (talk) 10:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I have to say ...
你这种人见人恨的呆B为什么会被生下来？ Your arrogance irritates everyone. You are still alive only because you live in a developed country. If you lived somewhere else, you would probably be killed by angry people. Cherish your life and stop being so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.132.180.178 (talk) 01:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Since Wikipedia is a free and harmonious place, no one should completely delete my last comment. However, if you feel some words in it are offensive, you can replace them with asterisks. 137.132.180.178 (talk) 01:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Calm down there m8. You're not making any sense. You're not explaining why you're angry, you're just telling me you're angry. That doesn't help me at all. Did something that I post from 2008 make you upset? Or was it something that I posted yesterday? Please be less vague. Your comment about where I live also makes no sense, I get the feeling you don't know what you're talking about. Having a higher standard of living means that I get enough nutrition for bodily growth, it has nothing to do with how many angry internet nerds get overreactions from nasty words on the internet. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 02:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Taiwan bla bla
Hi Ben, I just saw this edit pop up, does it look concerning to you? I don't remember what the decision was about these things (I feel like I remember there being big fights in the past about edits like this), and I couldn't care less whether people want to all it Taiwan or the ROC, but this kind of drive-by name-changing of a political entity always raises an alarm bell for me. r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 13:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Pretty much after the big change that happened a year ago was that when referring to a government or political entity, call it the ROC or ROC (Taiwan), for example "Ma Ying-jeou is the president of the ROC". When referring to any ordinary person who geographically comes from Taiwan, it's acceptable to use "Taiwan" (e.g. Mr. Hsu is a writer from Taiwan). Since Teresa Teng isn't exactly a political topic, it probably would be better to use Taiwan, as opposed to ROC. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 16:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Cool, that sounds familiar now that you mention it. Thanks, r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 21:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK-Good Article Request for Comment
Hi, would you like to elaborate your rationale in the General Discussion section?-- Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 09:38, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Are you idiot?
How many times should I tell you the same thing? There's no any official site says that Toukiden will be release in North America. So remove the contents which is not true is correct. Do not warn me again, do not undo my edit again and leave me along. Once again I will slay you by 100%. Don't think it's a joke. Get it you S.O.B?! Ohmamamiya (talk) 01:42, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your concerns at Toukiden
Hello there. Your concerns over the article Toukiden have been acknowledged. The unreliably sourced material have been replaced with reliable ones per the Wikipedia policy on verifiability. Woodroar has given Ohmamamiya some advice as that user's comment above towards you was pretty much out of line. I am very sorry you had to endure this type of abuse, but please don't let it get to you. Regards, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:53, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

See North Korea talk page
Thanks --TIAYN (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

你死定了!
你他媽的幹拎娘機掰咧! 你以為你是誰啊? 你是老大嗎? 海外華人了不起啊? 海外華人就可以濫用權利欺負新手是不是? 你好大的膽子，我看你是不想活了. 我警告你，你下次敢再來找我麻煩試試看，信不信我100%絕對會殺了你，別以為我在跟你開玩笑. Youpho (talk) 18:19, 21 August 2013‎ (UTC)

Good article reassessment/Chelsea Manning/1
Should I tag this with db-g6? If impossible, what are we going to do? --George Ho (talk) 10:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I have reverted your blanking of an article. If you wish to nominate for deletion, you should leave the text intact unless it involves gross personal attacks. If that is the case, remove the relevant text and contact an admin to remove the edits from the history.
 * Your speedy request was clearly misleading. You are not the only editor of this page.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I closed the reassessment for now. Per archive guideline, I may reopen it in WT:GAR, but let's wait for two weeks then, huh? --George Ho (talk) 17:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Regarding your question "who is Sue Gardner", she's the Wikimedia Foundation's Executive Director, you could say about equal footing to Jimbo Wales, the founder. See User:Sue Gardner. In my opinion, while she's as entitled to her views as any other editor, the strength of her argument matters more than her identity. (This is also her own view, if you read her user page, she wishes to be considered as any other editor.)

For identity, I'd assign more weight to a comment from a member of WMF's legal counsel, such as User:Geoffbrigham, but they seem to avoid participating in discussion (probably for good reason). ~Amatulić (talk) 19:55, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Regarding my comment, it was more of a sarcastic remark, making a point that people should be arguing points based on the merits of the argument as equals, and not make appeal to authority arguments. I am aware of Sue Gardner's status within the WMF. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 20:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Good, thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

I will unwatch the article for now. Please do not try to or let anyone else re-open the reassessment or start another reassessment. Whichever goes first, when the article becomes stable again within two weeks or is still unstable after two weeks, please notify me. Therefore, I will revert my closure, while you will request a reopening in WT:GAR. Got it? --George Ho (talk) 22:48, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. -- benlisquare T•C•E 05:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Actually, I don't think re-opening it is the only option. We might use GA reassessment request or have an "individual reassessment" rather than community. --George Ho (talk) 02:00, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello
Just dropping by to say hi to a fellow editor with similar background. We haven't worked together yet, but I like your involvement in China-related and (occasionally) controversial topics. Let me know whenever if there is anything I can help with. Alex ShihTalk 05:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh no!
What happened to the visually striking signature? Now it is more difficult to tell when somebody important is talking. I vaguely remember you saying that you fought bears or octopuses or something to keep the Chinese characters, despite many challenges. I sincerely hope that you're just laying low around a volatile Chelsea Manning situation and this change is not permanent (I know that you prefer "Bradley", but I prefer "Diaoyu Islands", and yet you use unadored "Senkaku" wikilinks...) Shrigley (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Nah, the change is permanent. I thought that having the same obnoxious signature since 2008(?) was getting stale, so I decided to change to something a bit more low-key and sensible. No longer is my signature extremely attention-grabbing, eye-catching and screaming of "LOOK AT MEEEEEE". Plus, I've previously been manhandled for having a non-Latin signature, and although I've ignored each little scuffle over it, I think from now on I'll stop being the rebellious rulebreaker that I formerly was. -- benlisquare T•C•E 16:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: Regarding Dragon's Crown
No problem. It's just that it was good, referenced content pertaining to that section. I hadn't known that the blacklisted website removal requests had all been denied. I'll cease defending this chunk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigJackman (talk • contribs) 06:29, 28 August 2013 (UTC)