User talk:Benmoreassynt

Speedy deletion of Kingey
A tag has been placed on Kingey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 10:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of TannerRitchie Publishing
A tag has been placed on TannerRitchie Publishing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TallNapoleon (talk) 23:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Grotrian-Steinweg
When I was searching Wikipedia for instances of the brand Grotrian-Steinweg I found your sandbox. Because you are clearly interested in the subject I wanted to invite you to help with the editing of the new article I put up today. Cheers! Binksternet (talk) 05:11, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

DRN Closed
Thank you for seeking assistance with the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. Unfortunately, the case filed had to be closed as not meeting a minimum DR/N criteria. There was not an extensive enough talkpage discussion. Please use a talkpage to discuss ways to improve the article. If, after a good collaborative effort is made a dispute still exists, you should feel welcome to re-file! Nihlus 19:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Bobby Cox, and BilCat
Bobby Cox is an alleged wife-beater. The history of the Bobby Cox page will show that both you and I, and a few others as well, have attempted to properly include that information in the Bobby Cox article. The record will also show that we have all been reverted by the redoubtable BilCat, who may or may not have a bias in the matter, but whose edits there could have been written by Bobby Cox himself.

I just wrote a note to BilCat on his Talk Page, asking him to please explain his edits there. I hereby invite you to please join the conversation.

Thank you. Vcuttolo (talk) 17:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)