User talk:Bennett1203/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Everyone Knows That (Ulterior Motives) (October 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Everyone Knows That (Ulterior Motives) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Everyone_Knows_That_(Ulterior_Motives) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maliner&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Everyone_Knows_That_(Ulterior_Motives) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 14:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Artist’s impression of the Titan Submarine above the surface of Kraken Mare on Titan.webp
Thanks for uploading File:Artist’s impression of the Titan Submarine above the surface of Kraken Mare on Titan.webp. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 23 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I am very sorry. I am terrible at using Wikipedia, and if I could have a tip on how to change the image’s properties I’d be very happy Bennett1203 (talk) 03:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 11:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Huygens Landing Site moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Huygens Landing Site. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huygens Landing Site (November 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Huygens Landing Site and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Huygens_Landing_Site Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stuartyeates&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Huygens_Landing_Site reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 07:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 1996 Shrek Movie


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 1996 Shrek Movie. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Shrek. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Shrek. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Caseoh


A tag has been placed on Caseoh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ~ A412  talk! 21:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Caseoh moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Caseoh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Venus with water&#59; in the past.webp
Thank you for uploading File:Venus with water&. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Kepler-23d for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kepler-23d is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kepler-23d until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Dr vulpes  (Talk) 23:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, I’ve overviewed the article, and I have agreed as well to delete the article. I’m sorry for the lack of information in this passage, although I do agree, and you can delete it. Bennett1203 (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Venus with water&#59; in the past.webp
Thanks for uploading File:Venus with water&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bill's Donut Shop
Hello Bennett1203,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bill's Donut Shop for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello! I was just wanting to inform other people on the internet about Bill’s donuts, as not that much information is online about the company. I thought compiling sites from the internet into one page so people could get as much information as they want about the company.
 * if you want to, you can delete the page, although I’m just a helpful contributor who wants to teach people about things! Bennett1203 (talk) 21:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Bennett1203, thanks for being understanding! The issue is that the subject of the article doesn't qualify as notable enough for an article. To do so, it must meet our General Notability Guidelines. I would suggest reading the links contained in the Welcome message on your Talk page, above. Kind regards, Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Bennett1203! Your additions to File:Bill’s Donut Shop in 2011.jpeg have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bill’s Donut Shop Logo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Bill’s Donut Shop Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 02:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello! If you want to delete the file, you can freely do it! Bennett1203 (talk) 20:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Bennett1203. Thank you for your work on NASA Explorers. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

C/1999 T1
Hi,

The information you wrote in the C/1999 T1 article you made is incorrect. C/1999 T1 has nothing to do with C/2006 P1; please don't confuse these two unrelated comets. If you have time, please fix this. Nrco0e (talk) 21:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I’m very sorry! I must’ve not noticed that! Thanks for telling me! Bennett1203 (talk) 21:39, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello, I'm Synorem. I noticed that in this edit to WatZatSong, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 02:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)


 * It's not a mistake. I deleted it because it's useless information to put in the history tab. The history tab of this article must be about events that happened in the sites history, not inadequate information. Bennett1203 (talk) 02:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * ps, i mustve removed an important part of the article! mistake!o Bennett1203 (talk) 02:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It was a short line about the site adding it's first unique feature, how would that be 'useless'? Nethertheless, the use of a edit summary would've helped here ^^ Synorem (talk) 02:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * not to sound mean; i'm not, I think the quiz part is farely useless, as it gives no direct important information about the history of the site. Say hypothetically someone is doing an essay about this, and ignore the teachers desperate attempts at telling her schoolchildren to not use Wikipedia, the kid wants to do an essay on this and he stumbles upon the quiz part. He wouldn't really add that into the essay unless he wants to do the extra mile. In my opinion I think it's somewhat useless, although I do half agree with your response, (not to sound mean again) but as a more experienced user on WatZatSong.com, I think it's fair to say this feature was added for fun by the developers. Then again I do respect your opinion. Bennett1203 (talk) 02:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Great articles
hey, great work on spacecraft and astronomy articles! Artem.G (talk) 15:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Fifth Gas Giant moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Fifth Gas Giant. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. –  22:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry, the correct reasoning is that it needs more sources to establish notability. I misclicked while I was draftifying your article. –  22:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Exploration of dwarf planets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ceres.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Huygens Landing Site


Hello, Bennett1203. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Huygens Landing Site".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians who use Reddit


A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians who use Reddit indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes. I understand, you can delete it. Bennett1203 (talk) 04:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Reddit topicon
Template:Reddit topicon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DB 1729 talk 11:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes you are free to do it. I was originally going to request a nomination for deletion of this article, but I never got to it. Bennett1203 (talk) 17:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alan MacMasters hoax
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alan MacMasters hoax you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 09:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alan MacMasters hoax
The article Alan MacMasters hoax you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alan MacMasters hoax and Talk:Alan MacMasters hoax/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 11:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)