User talk:Bennett27

Speedy deletion nomination of TSR Parts


A tag has been placed on TSR Parts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DSP2092 talk 15:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Colgate, North Dakota
If you still think the material you added to the article is sufficiently noteworthy and supported by reliable sources, I urge you to take it to the article Talk page per WP:BRD. You shouldn't be insisting on it and edit-warring over it.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I don't see what is not noteworthy about it, could you please tell me. Also about the reliable sources I was working on finding more reliable sources for the article. Bennett27 (talk) 01:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Your recent editing history at Colgate, North Dakota shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 23:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Vsmith can i get your opinion on this Bennett27 (talk) 23:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Check it out, added as a gallery. Vsmith (talk) 00:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Bennett27 (talk) 00:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)