User talk:Bennyzr

Edits to Zionism
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Zionism, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Rivertorch (talk) 20:38, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * As a well versed person in the views of Chabad-Lubavitch opinion on Zionism I am much better suited to representing such views than whoever originally published this opinion. Where is the source for the information that is there now? Bennyzr (talk) 21:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not contributor to that article and am unfamiliar with its history, particularly any concerns about its sourcing. The short paragraph which you changed and expanded appears to lack an inline citation. It should have one, and therefore it would be perfectly reasonable either to tag it—by typing —or to raise the matter of the missing citation on the talk page. Or both. But the lack of a source for the current wording doesn't justify replacing it with new wording with its own problems.
 * In addition to being unsourced, the text you added— "would only further imperil the already fragile and small geographical defefense capabilities that currently exist for Israel. In addtion, any compromises have only emboldend [sic] the opposing parties and do not provide any concrete and lasting peace" —is qualitatively different from what was there already because it makes predictions and contains non-neutral language and original research or opinion. What you wrote may well be true, but as a new contributor you may be unaware that truth isn't one of Wikipedia's objectives. Verifiability and neutrality are the name of the game, and original research is always verboten. Good luck! Rivertorch (talk) 00:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)