User talk:Bensevenpower

Analysis is decent but could be better written. Don't put the source of your information in the article. That is put in the reference section. Read the article thoroughly and do not put up duplicate information. Check to see if there section you're editing is best fit for that section. Remember, your contribution is to give information and not to support an argument. In other words, make your contribution based on facts. Omit "What is unique about BRAC". I would take your contribution down and add it back after making changes.

Simon74.123.251.51 (talk) 04:12, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Read wiki link. See "information style and tone"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles

Draysuh20974.123.251.51 (talk) 04:31, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 5 November 2013 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC)