User talk:Benzband/Archives/January 2014

Happy New Year, Benzband
  Pr at yya  (Hello!) — is wishing you a  Happy New Year ! Welcome the  2014 . Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2014 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2014 goes well for you.

Spread the New Year cheer by adding to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.

-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 13:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

December 2013 wikification awards.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 01:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thankyou, Wilhelmina Will! ~ benzband  ( talk ) 12:57, 3 January 2014 (UTC)



Frze > talk  — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

A barnstar for you!

 * Thankyou Demiurge1000! benzband  ( talk ) 22:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello User:Benzband...
I got a notice today saying "User:Formerly6697 was reviewed by Benzband" timestamped about 12:28 WP time. It didn't link to anything except my own Userpage. I am not familiar with this process at Wikipedia and the only thing I could find was this article but I am confused since apparently that is supposed to be by request which I did not do. Can you help me understand what this is all about? Why was I reviewed? Is there a report of some sort connected with this review and if so where is it? Did I pass/fail some kind of test? What are the plus's and minus's in all this? Please enlighten me. Thanks. F6697 FORMERLY   66.97.209.215 TALK 04:18, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I responded to this here. Newyorkadam (talk) 04:46, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam
 * indeed, Newyorkadam has summed up exactly what I did. I was using the curation toolbar at the time; you can find out more about the new page review process at New pages patrol. benzband  ( talk ) 12:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * : Thanks for the clarification. I am curious about everything and I like to understand new stuff. I like the idea of NPP and ER, it looks like a place to do good deeds, and I may just try out my hand at these in time when I feel a little more skilled. Keep up the good work. You might consider, however, that some newcomers are less curious and more paranoid nervous (which is why we have guidelines like WP:DONTBITE) so I wrote a suggestion on the talk page with Newyorkadam. Check it out. F6697  FORMERLY   66.97.209.215 TALK 21:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Titusfox + Chessy!
For Removing This Game From Wikipedia Games


 * Aye, well deserved! Have replied on your talkpage.


 * ~ benzband  ( talk ) 12:23, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

I shouldn't of challenged Bluecollarchessplayer if it was for the public to play, so I kinda deserve a trout too!

Ben, could you possibly come and make your move or get someone else to do it for you? Regards, Titus  Fox  08:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure! I have made a move for Black. benzband  ( talk ) 14:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Could You please sign all your moves? I will ask back on the wall to do this aswell. Regards, Titus  Fox  18:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Could You do it again, and please advertise this a little bit. Reagrds, Titus  Fox  17:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * There isn't really much you can do advertise it further than placing a link WP:WPGAMES and your own userpage; and I'm afraid that I'm not that active here these days so I won't be editing your chess page very often. However (and you probably know this) there are websites specifically designed for online chess which you might find more adapted than Wikipedia for the purpose. I'd recommend chess.com as a decent one which I've occasionally used in the past. benzband  ( talk ) 19:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Where'd Nommy Trout Go? Titus Fox  15:09, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Rudy Buttignol-One line addition & ref to end of career section
Hello Benzband, How are you? And happy 2014.

I haven't contacted you in awhile. However I'd like to add something to Rudy Buttignol's Wikipedia page.

I need to add the following line and Marsha Lederman's Globe & Mail ref to the end of paragraph 1 of his Career section.

Here is the info:

}}
 * Also, if when the series airs it gathers sufficient coverage in reliable third-party sources to assert notability, you could then create an article on it.
 * P.S.: When using html tags (such as ) but you don't won't them to work, for instance when using them in an example on a talk page, you can enclose them in   to prevent them from working. Regards,  benzband  ( talk ) 19:12, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Dear Benzband, Thanks for reading the Marsha Lederman Globe & Mail article so closely and I agree that the addition of context for the "ER" television series works. I can't top your work. Okay if I post as is at the end of para 1 Career?

Many thanks,

Sofiabrampton Sofiabrampton (talk) 23:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Of course, please feel free to do so!
 * Also, I took the liberty of moving your comment down into this section (if you don't mind) as it was clearly a reply to my post. When replying to a comment on a discussion page, it is considered good practice to post below said comment and using indentation (by inserting the right amount of colons :) if needed. Additionally, new sections are usually placed at the bottom of a page (Teahouse/Questions constitutes a rare exception). These are just conventional practices, meant to help maintain the flow and readability of a discussion, and it obviously doesn't matter if you make mistakes (no harm is done as they can easily be fixed should they pose a problem). You can see also Help:Using talk pages and Talk page guidelines if you haven't already seen those pages and wish to learn more.
 * As for the brief exchange with titusfox on your talkpage, I thought I'd just make clear that while modifying another editor's comment is frowned upon, every editor is indeed welcome to join an ongoing discussion and add their own comments (no one "owns" a discussion). benzband  ( talk ) 20:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello again benzband. Thanks for your help with Rudy Buttignol and I will make the addition to the Career section now. And thanks for the Wikipedia etiquette lesson. I can't understand "(by inserting the right amount of colons :)" and so I tried to indent manually. Sorry about the trout thing. I was looking for you and it went on the other page by mistake. I have so much to learn! Sofiabrampton (talk) 22:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The more colons (Colon (punctuation)) you add the more the indentation. Here's a little example:

Comment. -- User 1
 * Reply. -- User 2
 * Reply to User 2. -- User 1
 * Reply to that and bla bla bla bla bla.
 * Bla bla bla bla bla. -- User 2
 * Reply to first comment. -- User 3
 * Reply to User 3 with numbered list:
 * Firstly
 * Secondly
 * -- User 1
 * How about with bullets:
 * Like this.
 * You see? -- User 3
 * Reply to bullets. -- User 1
 * Reply to bullets also. -- User 2
 * Which produces:


 * On the other hand adding spaces in front makes the formatting look like a code box, as you can see on your comment above. benzband  ( talk ) 18:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello Benzband. I understand the use of  colons now.  Thanks again.
 * Sofiabrampton (talk) 20:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

VisualEditor newsletter for Janaury 2014
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has worked mostly minor features and fixing bugs. A few significant bugs include working around a bug in CSSJanus that was wrongly flipping images used in some templates in right-to-left (RTL) environments (bug 50910) a major bug that meant inserting any template or other transclusion failed (bug 59002), a major but quickly resolved problem due to an unannounced change in MediaWiki core, which caused VisualEditor to crash on trying to save (bug 59867). This last bugs did not appear on any Wikipedia. Additionally, significant work has been done in the background to make VisualEditor work as an independent editing system.

As of today, VisualEditor is now available as an opt-out feature to all users at 149 active Wikipedias.


 * The character inserter tool in the "Insert" menu has a very basic set of characters. The character inserter is especially important for languages that use Latin and Cyrillic alphabets with unusual characters or frequent diacritics. Your feedback on the character inserter is requested. In addition to feedback from any interested editor, the developers would particularly like to hear from anyone who speaks any of the 50+ languages listed under Phase 5 at mw:VisualEditor/Rollouts, including Breton, Mongolian, Icelandic, Welsh, Afrikaans, Macedonian, and Azerbaijani.
 * meta:Office hours on IRC have been heavily attended recently. The next one will be held this coming Wednesday, 22 January at 23:00 UTC.
 * You can now edit some of the page settings in the "options" dialog –    and   as selection (forced on, forced off, or default setting; bugs 56866 and 56867) and   as a checkbox (bug 57166).
 * The automated browser tests were adjusted to speed them up and bind more correctly to list items in lists, and updated to a newer version of their ruby dependencies. You can monitor the automated browser tests' results (triggered every twelve hours) live on the server.
 * VisualEditor/User guide was updated recently to show some new and upcoming features.

Looking ahead: The character formatting menu on the toolbar will get a drop-down indicator next Thursday. The reference and media items will be the first two listed in the Insert menu. The help menu will get a page listing the keyboard shortcuts. Looking further out, image handling will be improved, including support for alignment (left, right, and center) and better control over image size (including default and upright sizes). The developers are also working on support for editing redirects and image galleries.

Subscriptions to this newsletter are managed at VisualEditor/Newsletter. Please add or remove your name to change your subscription settings. If you have questions or suggestions for future improvements, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting a note at VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 20:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paradox of tolerance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intolerance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Titusfox for autoconfirmed
Hey benzband, I just want to let you know that I am requesting for a position as autoconfirmed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titusfox (talk • contribs) 17:17, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey Titusfox, you already are autoconfirmed! See User access levels. :-) benzband  ( talk ) 19:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Now going for rollbacker! Titus Fox  16:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Testing
Checking MassMessage. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)