User talk:Benzygs940

Re: Bot Shutdown
Thanks for your message. Can you explain further why the bot should be shutdown? - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 09:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
— G FOLEY   F OUR!  — 01:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Trouting
Trouting is only supposed to be used for reminders of things like site policies, not to grieve about a user's action within policy like blocking an IP address.Jasper Deng (talk) 00:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Goldblooded, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You really need to stop these nonsense actions, like trouting Gfoley4. You will be blocked the next time you do this.'' Jasper Deng (talk) 00:40, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Little word of advice
Firstly, How on earth did you find my page? I dont even know you! Secondly, to be honest i dont think you should be unbanned since your account is used purely to annoy people, ive seen your edits and theres no clear explanation to what you were doing. On some of the unconstructive edits You speak of something about a school ban? Perhaps people from your school kept vanadalising on here and got banned, its commonplace.

But there was no need or point to create an account on here to purely rant about it and annoy/troll others and clearly you have no intention of actually improving wikipedia or helping out other users. Goldblooded (talk) 02:09, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Goldblooded is right, except that banning is a very serious thing that's different from blocking. Blocking is a mere technical restriction, but a ban is formal, and is often enforced by blocks. Goldblooded, I think Benzygs940 had looked at my contribs based on the fact that he impersonated me with those fake warnings. As for you, Benzygs940, you're clearly not here to build an encyclopedia, so I suggest the reviewing admin decline the unblock request and removal talk page access.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:32, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

im want you to unblock this account
this account is not used by the school.it used by home.im suggest you all to accept my child account due to his punishmentand he said:he sorry for what he done.

that it
im not some dummy.im am a grown up.im not playing with wikipedia.unblock me right now or i get the wikipedia police to do it for me.

please
i wanna....use.......the wikipedia chat.....to talk to the....user

you know what.i dont care,i make a new one at home.you never get me.

Some more advice.
I believe myself and Jasper have made ourselves clear;

What do you expect to get from people when you vandalise their pages and troll them? What article are you trying to create anyway? Had you of acted decently and with a bit of chivarly and WP:FAITH then you wouldnt of been banned. Also, if you really are an adult- how come you said something about child punishment? Besides the way you talk and act to other admins and users is childish; Perhaps give a clear explanation of what you intend to do if you were unbanned not just whiny begging crap and then the admins may or may not reconsider. Goldblooded (talk) 23:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)