User talk:Berber1

February 2011
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Libya, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Bushranger One ping only 19:01, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * What defamatory content did I add? Quote please. Berber1 (talk) 19:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * This section is an egregious WP:CIVIL violation; "tit for tat" not a Wikipedia policy, while "slacktivists who may have just learned the country of Libya existed last week" is the specific defamatory term. Your post is also declaring an intention to disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * To avoid a WP:CIVIL violation I, intentionally, did not refer to anyone by name. Long before I ever get penalized for WP:CIVIL - I hope and expect - the people who have been using epithets like "pro-Qadaffi" (directed at a SPECIFIC USER) are, likewise, penalized. Are those plans in the works? Berber1 (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Felixhonecker for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. The Bushranger One ping only 19:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the notification. Berber1 (talk) 19:42, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Note
I do not accept the CU result of "unlikely" and I have added the suspected sockpuppet tag to the user page. Viriditas (talk) 01:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)