User talk:Berek/Archive 1

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;


 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~ 

snoyes 15:39, 4 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Wow, two years editing the Wikipedia and you finally get a welcome (from someone who only registered last year)! Is this a record ? -- Derek Ross 03:55, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Auditing Link
While I was at work this morning, I thought to myself that the way I reworded the opening paragraph really called for a link to Auditing. And you beat me to it. Thanks.--Fredrik Coulter 00:04, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)

History of Religion in the Netherlands
Hi Berek. I am pretty new on Wikipedia. I don't know if i am using the talk page the right way. I also lost my data about Religion in the Netherlands. I wrote more then a thousand words after the Frankish period, and it is all lost. Is it, or can i get it back somewhere? I forgot to log in at first. I am the user that started the page.

Daan


 * Hi Daan, I can't seen anything more saved under the Franks in the history of the article, so I'm afraid it's lost. You did fine with the talk page, although we usually add new stuff at the bottom of the page (I'll move this there soon), and we also sign our names using ~, like this: Berek 6 July 2005 15:43 (UTC)

Elizabeth II renaming (round XXXIV)
You may have noticed *mega sigh* that yet another user has dragged up the lets rename Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom farce, only 9 days after the last vote ended. (What next? A vote every day on the issue next?) I have proposed instead this vote on Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom page:

That Wikipedia stop wasting time on endless revoting on this goddamned issue and ban votes on this issue from this page for at least six months.

Hopefully this will put this nonsense to bed for at least 6 months. Your (hopefully final) vote would be welcome. Fear ÉIREANN \(caint) 21:08, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

I've now voted. Berek 11:36, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Category:Europe
You reverted my edit to remove Category:Scotland from Category:Europe, saying that you see other countries there. You must have mistaken the articles in Category:Europe for the subcategories. Is it 'OK' to get Category:Scotland out of Category:Europe? Thelb ' 4 15:19, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Highgate Wood
Thanks! I often wonder how people are so quickly on to obscure articles like this one. Is there some log of new articles or something? ElectricRay 14:40, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it's Special:Newpages. Hope this helps. Berek 08:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Please remove categories from Berek/Sandbox
You're creating links from category pages to your user page which I don't think is proper Wiki-etiquette. --JeffW 03:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Categories removed. --Berek 07:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

The Stotfield Fishing Disaster
You altered 'ferm toun' to 'farm town'. I've reverted to original as this is a real Scots expression and relevant in a historical context. Billreid 08:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I think the italics you've put round it this time make this clearer. Thanks for the message. Berek 09:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Ruislip Lido
Dude, that was quick. In the middle of my creating this article and saving as I went coz I am on an unreliable link, you managed to confuse the heck out of me by removing things I was adding, and by changing links. Trust me, it is "London borough of Hillingdon" that needs linking, not "London" and "Hillingdon". It is, after all, in Ruislip. I know the pages are for "anyone to edit", but leaping in that quickly meant total bewilderment. Fiddle Faddle 15:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Apologies for any confusion. "London borough of Hillingdon" was a red link, which stuck out in the article, and I thought it might be best if I changed it. Berek 15:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Article now links to London Borough of Hillingdon.Berek 15:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Pages listed on Categories for deletion
Discussion on CFD - proposal to merge all subcats of Category:Members of the United Kingdom Parliament from Scottish constituencies up into the main cat. Relevant categories which would be deleted are:

I think that this is a rather important discussion for editors interested in Scotland-related articles, especially Scottish politics and Scottish biographical articles (particularly local history). Please have a read and ponder, and contribute to the debate if you like. Thanks. --Mais oui! 17:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * It would also be relevant in this context to consider the discussions in the parent category for the UK parliament: Category talk:British MPs. I find it regrettable that Mais oui! has engaged in a restructuring of that category without entering into the discussions there.  --BrownHairedGirl 17:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_July_23 is just about to close. I would really appreciate your contribution, because this debate needs some serious input. --Mais oui! 09:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Scotland

 * Pre-script: we are currently undergoing peer review, see: Peer review/Scotland.

I am beginning to think that the Scottish Wikipedians' notice board is not the best vehicle for pushing up the quality of the Scotland article (we ought to try to get it to WP:FA, in order to get into Version 0.5, or, failing that, Version 1.0), and the other key Scottish articles. It is becoming increasingly obvious to me that we really ought to start up the long-mooted WikiProject Scotland.

Most of the stuff at the notice board (at least on the bottom half) is actually WikiProject material anyway, and the Talk page is really being used as a WikiProject talk already! The notice board should be just that: for bunging up brief notices and signposts. I am thinking of launching a Wikiproject and correspondingly radically clearing out, and chopping down, the noticeboard (a re-launch if you like). The Scotland Portal concept is fine (but currently mediocre/undynamic content), but in stasis: it needs a good kick up the jacksie.

For comparison, have a look at:
 * WikiProject Norway
 * WikiProject Australia
 * WikiProject New Zealand
 * WikiProject Peru
 * WikiProject Hong Kong
 * etc.

And, if you are at a loose end, have a look at: Thoughts? Please express them here. --Mais oui! 18:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Version 0.5 Nominations
 * Version 1.0 Nominations
 * Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WPPlaces
 * Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Medieval Scotland articles by quality
 * WikiProject
 * WikiProject/Best practices

WikiProject Scotland
Following a successful period of consultation WikiProject Scotland has now been launched. As a participant in the Scottish Wikipedians' notice board I wonder if you may be interested in this new endeavour too? If so, please sign-up here. The WikiProject will be replacing some of the functions of the notice board, especially those in the lower half.

While I am here, please also have a look at the new WikiProject Deletion sorting/Scotland and give it a "Watch". It was started up by User:Visviva a few days ago, after long being mooted at the notice board, and effectively replaces all the AfD listings at the notice board. Being a transclusion of all the on-going discussions it is a much more useful tool.

Even if you do not want to spend too much time on the WikiProject, please give it a "Watch" and feel free to contribute to Talk page discussions: the more contributors the merrier.

All the best. --Mais oui! 10:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

List of Scotland-related topics
Please join the discussion at: Thanks. --Mais oui! 08:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Talk:List of Scotland-related topics


 * Ta for the notice. Just had v quick glance: good start. I'm away out now, but hopefully will have chance to contribute during weekend. Cin cin! --Mais oui! 20:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

User:AlexNewArtBot
Hi, as a WikiProject Scotland participant, please check out this  this thread and consider adding the bot results page to your watchlist so we can manually update the New Articles page. There are some false results for the first batch, but I'm sure we can collectively tune the rules to improve the output.

If we get enough people watching the results page, we'll be cooking with gas as they say :)  This looks like a great helper in finding new Scotland related material. Cheers. -- Cactus.man   &#9997;  22:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

James Curtis (politician)
Prince Edward Island did not become part of Canada until 1873. It was a British colony with its own government from 1769 until 1873. --Big_iron (talk) 10:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
for your help regarding Reconstruction (architecture)! Greetings from Vienna!

Robert Schediwy 86.32.215.9 (talk) 04:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

She Stoops To Conquer
Hi. I redirected your page She Stoops To Conquer to She Stoops to Conquer as the article already exists there. Thanks Paul20070 (talk) 18:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks Paul, I screwed up on that one. Underbars always confuse me! Berek (talk) 22:22, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

thanks
for the expanding --TheGreenGorilla (talk) 12:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the thank you! :) Berek (talk) 12:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Can you Help
Hello, im sorry if this message is wrong but if you are an wikipedia adminstrator do you think you could maybe fix the coat of arms as the discusion on the talk page is getting out of control, Do you think you could --84.13.84.31 (talk) 16:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Firstly, I'm not an administrator, just an editor like everyone else. Secondly, you don't make clear which article you are referring to - could you make that clear? Thanks. Berek (talk) 10:58, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Canon K.K. v. Green Cartridge Co.
Canon K.K. v. Green Cartridge Co. is a Privy Council deciusion, not a US case. --PraeceptorIP (talk) 19:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * OK sorry my mistake Berek (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Beggars Opera albums' links
Hello, I fixed the links that Act One and Pathfinder contained. However, these links are now not very informative; but at least, they don't lead to something that is totally irrelevant to the subject. Feel free to improve them. JTMnen (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Citroen C1 ev'ie
Wow, you don't hang about eh! Thanks for that minor change, slipped by me. You may want to look at the other articles I've created or modified:


 * Electric Car Corporation
 * Citroen C1 (just really link to Citroen C1 ev'ie]]
 * Evie (dab page)
 * Electric car added figures into table, and added some bits into United Kingdom section

Somebody will probably grumble about ECC being a primary source but really I cannot see the problem with that when it's manufacturer's figures etc. In any case those figures are reported in all the other sources which should be RS (The Times, BBC, Autocar etc), it just always seems better to me to go to the horse's mouth when it is a simple question of fact.

I am not sure how far to go with redirects (perm Citroën/Citroen Evie/Ev'ie/evie/ absence or presence of C1 e.g. will it just in common parlance, if it catches on, just be called "the Evie"? I think "wait and see" approach is probably best.

Thanks! (And I hate you!--- nah only joking) SimonTrew (talk) 11:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Accounting information system
A tag has been placed on Accounting information system requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Miami33139 (talk) 21:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Disregard! This was marked as a copyvio, and I verified it was a copyvio. I dug through the history and found about six months ago someone dumped copyvio text into the article. I fixed the copyvio problem by reverting backwards six months. Sorry for the trouble. Miami33139 (talk) 21:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Uh-oh ...
One of us has an evil twin ... and since your account has been around since 2001 and mine only since 2006, it must be me!

We've never crossed paths before, so we must not be active in the same areas; but still, this could cause confusion. I may try thinking of a different username and see if I can get mine changed at some point. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * FYI: I started a discussion at WP:ANI to see where consensus lays on the risk of confusion, feel free to join the discussion. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I've added a distinguish tag to my user page and added a little to the above discussion. Hope this helps! :)Berek (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and sorry about the similar name ... hopefully the distinguish tag will help avoid any confusion for us in the future. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome - it was nice to "meet" you - I'm jealous of your accomplishments here - well done! :) Berek (talk) 22:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:10, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Courcelles! Berek (talk) 11:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

User request (moved from main user page)
Hello; I came across your Timeline of Glasgow history page. Good work. I need some help and/or advice about a Wikipedia page I find offensive; I would like the page to be deleted. I contacted you because you appear to have the time, patience and experience to best approach this matter.

Regards. 78.143.209.197 (talk) 01:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC) ps; As I have no user page of my own I will come back to this page to see if you've posted a response to my request. Thank you.

I think I should have entered the four tildes.. Okay, I'll do it again; Yachtee (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, Yachtee, I'm not an administrator so won't be able to delete any article, but I might be able to point you to somenone who can help, or at least tag the article for and administrator's consideration. Please post a message including the article name and I'll see if I can help Berek (talk) 20:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

History of Edinburgh
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of History of Edinburgh, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.gotoedinburgh.co.uk/history/Complete-history-of-Edinburgh.asp.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * This seems to have been sorted on the History of Edinburgh page now, thanks to User:VernoWhitney for their help. Berek (talk) 16:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

AfD notification
You may wish to weigh in at Articles for deletion/FK Atletico Beograd. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:54, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Drmies, seems I was too late to join the discussion. Berek (talk) 20:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought I'd play it safe at AfD, rather than simply restoring the hoax tag. Thanks anyway! Drmies (talk) 20:49, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. Cheers!Berek (talk) 20:54, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

RFC on Bot template page
Hi. Just wondered if you would like to comment on the Bot template page where a discussion about the change of the icon that trial bots use has been started. I feel more input is required before consensus is reached. You are reciving this message as you are signed up for the RFC service. Thank you. Cj005257 (talk) 18:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC).
 * Thanks for the invite, cj! I've added my tuppenceworth. Berek (talk) 19:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Canada under British rule (1763–1867)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Canada under British rule (1763–1867). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Added my comment Berek (talk) 20:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Côte d'Ivoire
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Côte d'Ivoire. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Added my commentBerek (talk) 20:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Greco-Turkish War (1919-1922)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Greco-Turkish War (1919-1922). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Added my comment. Berek (talk) 20:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Maratha, Santalaris and Aloda massacre
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Maratha, Santalaris and Aloda massacre. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Added my brief comment. Berek (talk) 21:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1948 Arab–Israeli War
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:1948 Arab–Israeli War. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:26, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I think I may pass on commenting on this one - it looks pretty heated with two sides with entrenched views. Berek (talk) 21:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:War of the Pacific
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:War of the Pacific. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 20:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:37, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Disambiguation
re Category:Disambiguation:

Please try to avoid adding the markup to any Dab page (or any article), as you did with Animal Fair, Balik, and Cistulli. That Cat is acceptable on only a few dozen pages, all in other than the Main namespace. The basic Cat assignment for Dab pages is to a different Cat, and it should be effected by adding a template -- Disambig, unless you have a reason to put an atypical Dab into a different Cat -- between the last entry and any interlanguage links (or the end if there are no ILLs). Thanks for working on Dabs! --Jerzy•t 08:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads-up, Jerzy! I'll try and keep this in mind when I'm categorising Dabs. Berek (talk) 21:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Anthony Irby (1576-1610) declined
When nominating things for speedy deletion it is important to check the page's history. The page had no content because it had just been blanked. I've restored and repaired the redirect that was previously there and declined your nomination. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:37, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks.Berek (talk) 19:38, 25 December 2011 (UTC)