User talk:Berend de Boer

Waite
The article D. A. Waite is being considered for deletion. Please give your vote. By the way, according to Jonge the real reason to include the Comma by Erasmus, was his care for his good name and for the success of his Novum Testamentum. Have you ever red articles of Henk Jan de Jonge? I do not think so.
 * Henk Jan de Jonge, Novum Testamentum a nobis versum
 * Henk Jan de Jonge, Erasmus und die Glossa Ordinaria zum Neuen Testament
 * Henk Jan de Jonge, Erasmus and the Comma Johanneum, Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 1980, pp. 381-389

With regards. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 00:21, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Really Leszek, why do you really, really want to peddle information that has been proven false, and even Metzger himself retracted in his 3rd edition? I just can't get my head around this.

Welcome
Hello, Berend de Boer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! KillerChihuahua ?!?Advice 22:31, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Please note that blogs are almost never acceptable as sources. There are exceptions, but they are few.

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carterton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

July 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Shooting of Alton Sterling, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''Please do not add your own analysis or interpretation of sources. It is not allowed on Wikipedia.'' - MrX 01:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Alert
As I said in the edit summary, there are editing restrictions on this page that you have to follow. You are welcome to join the discussion on the talk page and/or propose the addition for gaining consensus on the talk page Galobtter (pingó mió) 21:33, 5 August 2018 (UTC)