User talk:Berenger92

December 2016
Hello, I'm Contributor321. I noticed that you made a change to an article, University of San Francisco, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Contributor321 (talk) 20:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Contributor321. I noticed that you recently removed some content from University of San Francisco without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Contributor321 (talk) 20:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at University of San Francisco, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Contributor321 (talk) 20:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to University of San Francisco. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Contributor321 (talk) 21:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at University of San Francisco. Contributor321 (talk) 21:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at University of San Francisco shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Contributor321 (talk) 21:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)