User talk:Bergin

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Working memory(jess)) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ArglebargleIV 22:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Welcome from me too and I hope you enjoy editing wp as much as I do. You might like to consider whether

[| your edit] at Megaliths was any less nonsensical than the one mentioned above ... but hey you may surprise us all and go the constructive route. :) Abtract (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Morris Rosenberg
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Morris Rosenberg, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Job Feeds has no reliable sources
Hello Bergin. Recently you added Job Feeds as a See Also to the RSS article. Possibly your aim was to 'de-orphanize' the article which is certainly a worthwhile goal. After you added it, I went over to look at Job Feeds. I am concerned that Job Feeds has no reliable sources and has the air of something that is made up. It was created back in 2007 but has not been able to acquire any actual sources in the intervening time. Would you have any objection to my nominating the article for deletion? EdJohnston (talk) 03:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

no not at all, go ahead EdJohnston

Recent edit to Colonel Tom Parker
Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Colonel Tom Parker article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! TranquilHope (talk) 03:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)