User talk:BerkBerk68/archive 1

BerkBerk68 Talk Page
Feel free to write anything. You can be sure about that I will respond. BerkBerk68 (talk) 13:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Syrian National Army, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! – MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 20:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

DS Alert: Armenia–Azerbaijan
signed,Rosguill talk 14:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

DS Alert: Kurds and Kurdistan
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:31, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:09, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at AANES. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

  Des Vallee (talk) 14:05, 2 July 2021 (UTC) Des Vallee Dude, are you serious? 1- I'm already trying to discuss in Talk page as I said in both edit page and talk page itself. however, instead of answering, you are just trying to turn the discussion into another topic. 2- The page has one revert rule. However, I violated it only once and then never violated any rules. I don't think I am doing something wrong in terms of rules. BerkBerk68 (talk) 14:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * No you violated the rule multiple times, and you recently gamed the system by making a flood of edits to your page to get extended confirmed. Also see WP:EDIT WARRING while the revert rule is a good thumb, edit warring can take place over a longer period of time. If a user frequently without concensus on the talk, which you clearly don't have. Des Vallee (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Also discussing an issue isn't enough, unless you have consensus on the talk you are not allowed re-add the changes. Which you clearly don't, you claim the other 6 editors who reverted you are edit warring yet you want to add utterly controversial material, and think just being in a discussion is enough to allow you to re-add the material, see onus on the one who adds the material. Des Vallee (talk) 14:23, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * False information?? only 4 editors reverted me. however, one editor reverted in my side. BerkBerk68 (talk) 16:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Des Vallee (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring at Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 5 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 01:59, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, BerkBerk68, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 23:10, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

And perhaps User:Uhudlu Okçu. S0091 (talk) 23:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

AE warning
I've deleted WikiProject Contra due to its ethno-national, disruptive focus, thinly disguised as universal in nature. I am letting you know that any further such disruption is likely to be met by sanctions, so please tread lightly in the overlapping topic area covered by WP:KURDS and WP:SCW. This is a logged warning. Thank you in advance for your close attention to this matter. El_C 10:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * El_C Okay I really don't understand the reason. We didn't do anything against Wikipedia rules. Also our scope is not WP:KURDS, only Rojava and PKK related pages were at our scope with their good parts and bad parts. as I said we didn't do anything against the rules, I really don't understand the reason why the Wikiproject should be banned. Thanks. BerkBerk68 (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Except, it is against the rules (WP:NOT), is my assessment. And I have the mandate from the community and am authorized by the Arbitration Committee to make that determination. Again, this is an Arbitration enforcement action (WP:ACDS), so the option of appealing directly to the Committee is available to you (WP:ARCA). El_C 19:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * El_C Oh, I see. So I guess I got that we did not violate the rules according to you aswell. If people from other ethnicities is necessary for our project, we already had one Kurd and one Crimean Tatar. our Kurdish teammate knows Kurdish as main langauge at speaking, he also knows how to write aswell in a level. BerkBerk68 (talk) 19:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * BerkBerk68, I'm not sure how you arrived at that conclusion... I'm contending that you did break the rules. That's what this warning is about. El_C 19:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * El_C Can you state the rule that the project violated? Also sorry about the missunderstanding. BerkBerk68 (talk) 20:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It's okay. It's in parenthesis in my comment above: WP:NOT. El_C 20:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah I saw that but, Did I violate whole page? :) well thats not important, I will read it later. Thanks for your solidarity. BerkBerk68 (talk) 21:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Its general imperative, yes. No problem. Glad we were able to work this out amicably. And a word of unsolicited advise: learn the ropes in uncontentious areas of the project first, because the contentious ones are a minefield. Regards, El_C 21:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Xiongnu you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 15:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)