User talk:Berksenterprisegeek

Speedy deletion nomination of Forest Design


A tag has been placed on Forest Design, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red dogsix (talk) 22:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Lower Earley
Please do not blank the Talk page when it raises some issues which genuinely need to be discussed. It is simply discourteous to do this.

My revisions to Lower Earley were made because the population figure that you have given appears to be for Earley, not Lower Earley. The two expressions are not synonymous. It is difficult precisely to define where Lower Earley begins and ends (Earley is a civil parish, served by a Town Council, so it has definited boundaries). The total figure for, say, the Hillside and Hawkedon Borough Wards would seem much more accurately to represent an accurate figure for Lower Earley itself.Ntmr (talk) 17:42, 5 May 2015 (UTC)