User talk:BerlinPorto

Hello and welcome!
Hello! This is just a friendly note that I have reverted one of your edits because you removed a lot of content and changed the flow of the article. I believe your edits have merit, but you should be sure to preview your edits so that you can verify if existing wiki-markup has been removed. Furthermore, it is inappropriate to remove facts and references from articles because they don't agree with your point of view. Your edit removed some facts and content from the article, specifically relating to the person's heritage and birth. Please be careful with your edits, if you'd like some help you can ask other editors (such as myself) or read our introduction article to get some starting tips. If you want to re-add the content I reverted, I am open to doing so, but you must ensure that the article's markup isn't removed in the process and that you yourself aren't introducing a bias into the article that contravenes WP:NPOV. Good luck editing! (If you'd like to reply to this message, leave me a message!)  Jargon777    Leave a message  14:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ahlam Shibli, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ahlam Shibli was changed by BerlinPorto (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918703 on 2012-06-11T22:03:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Ahlam Shibli. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.  Dadude3320  18:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as seen in Ahlam Shibli, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 18:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Your edits are disruptive. The article is nominated for deletion; you may speak your mind in that discussion but you may not remove the AfD template or have an alternate version of the article on your user page. You can work on an article in a sandbox in your user space, which you can create by clicking User:BerlinPorto/sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:38, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as seen in Ahlam Shibli, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=497392622 here].  W a g g e r s  TALK  13:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 13:28, 13 June 2012 (UTC)