User talk:Bernard Erlang

Hi Bernard,

The fact of the matter is that nobody is using Gameranger to play BF2. Nearly everyone is using Revive BF2 and a few servers are using BF2HUB. Although Gameranger may be the "official endorsement" why would anyone want to use it? It doesn't have a proper BF2 community, support or the most important thing Player Stats which Battlelog backed up...

Reply: Nearly everyone is using Revive BF2 and a few servers are using BF2HUB You have sources for that? If not then there's no reason to taint an otherwise good Wikipedia article!

Hi Benard,

Engineerisaac here. Try telling the truth more. We are not a EA official supported platform either. Its good to tell the community the truth rather then lie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:283:8100:9E0D:CD71:7ED9:1015:CBA0 (talk) 04:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Reply: Wikipedia is about knowledge, facts and proof.

Claims are none of them.

Individuals come here and pull figures from your website (claims) and declare them as proof - that's not how this site works!

I only undo such changes and you come here to accuse me of lying?

Also: where did I proclaim bf2hub being official? Nowhere - because I never did. I just undid unproven changes. I recommend that you take a look at my first revision on this article from 14:24, 26 December 2015 that clearly shows how it looked when I reverted it the first time:

The game can still be played online by using one of these providers: GameRanger (via official endorsement by EA[7]) or community solutions as Revive BF2 or BF2Hub.

But you only see what you want to see, right? --Bernard Erlang (talk) 13:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)