User talk:Bernardgroen

Speedy deletion of Ethical Advantage
A tag has been placed on Ethical Advantage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bvlax2005 (talk) 11:47, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You contested the speedy deletion of Ethical Advantage and probably rightly so. However, in order to avoid such problems in the future, you should consider developing your articles in your own sandbox, and not posting them to the general Wikipedia until they are in a sufficient state of completion to avoid such requests.WikiDan61 (talk) 12:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ethical Advantage
I have nominated Ethical Advantage, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ethical Advantage. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ... disco spinster   talk  14:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Since you removed all content from the article, I've deleted it under WP:CSD. I think this was the right thing to do, and would encourage you to work on Business ethics and the appropriate sub-articles thereof, while avoiding the introduction of original research to those articles.  GRBerry 17:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC)