User talk:Bernd in Japan

I've added the "prod" template to the article Matthew Ward, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Matthew Ward. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 05:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

International Accreditation Forum
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of International Accreditation Forum, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello – I saw your message on the article's talk page, where you said you 'borrowed two sentences' that triggered CorenBot. Unfortunately, the article was only two sentences long. You can't claim fair use of two sentences if the entire article is made of those two sentences of'borrowed' text. It's a slam dunk for copyright violation, and I deleted the article. Sorry. :-) Krakatoa  Katie  04:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, forget it
I did not find the time and sources to create anything substantially improving the original text. So let it be removed and everyone go via search engines to find what this is all about. Bernd in Japan (talk) 00:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Record changer dscn1667a.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Record changer dscn1667a.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Indoor antenna for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indoor antenna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Indoor antenna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Roxy the dog . wooF 20:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)