User talk:Bernie2233/sandbox

Peer Review
Your lead gives a good overview of the article. I feel like the last sentence is too long maybe you could try to make 2 sentences with it.

Your article is well divided. Every essential information is put forward correctly.

To me, your article seems neutral or at least I did not feel like you were biased. I just noticed that in the paragraph about "mandate and structure", you write twice the word "formerly" maybe inadvertently.

Your information comes from different sources that seems reliable as they are newspapers article.

You made a good job. Keep going

- previous comment from User:Kmzm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwebsterbu (talk • contribs) 16:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
You have a very good structure and you have a good flow of information. I did however notice a few typos and I did take the time to correct one of them. After reading your article I feel as though I have an excellent overview of your subject but I do think there could be a little more detailed information added, especially when it comes to the recommendations made by the TRC.

JD — Preceding unsigned comment added by JacobDurocher1992 (talk • contribs) 01:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)