User talk:Berniejw

Speedy deletion of Miles brooks gornto
A tag has been placed on Miles brooks gornto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Acroterion  (talk)  04:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Evidence of Miles' Homeschooling.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Evidence of Miles' Homeschooling.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Soxπed Ninety Three | t cd b 04:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Evidence_of_Miles'_Homeschooling.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Evidence_of_Miles'_Homeschooling.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. thadius856talk 04:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Anjem.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Anjem.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Parrot of Doom 20:29, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Provoking reddit
"dear Reddit - please disappear back under your stones" is a provocative comment and will only result in a backlash. Adding old pictures of hate preacher Anjem Choudary to the personal life section of his page is going against what guidelines? What right do you have to tell a community what they can and can't edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.148.6.198 (talk) 21:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)