User talk:Bernietaylor

Welcome!
Hello, Bernietaylor, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 19:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lascaux has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lascaux was changed by Bernietaylor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952321 on 2014-07-13T22:25:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:25, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Your edits
Thank you for your efforts but, like many new editors, you are not aware of our policies and guidelines regarding sources. First of course you have a conflict of interest and need to read WP:COI. But more crucially, I'm afraid that your book doesn't meet our criteria for sources. If you read WP:VERIFY and WP:RS you will see that we rarely accept self-published material as sources. The articles you are interested in should use for the most part academic sources. There is also another issue which is relevant, and that is described in our Neutral Point of View policy at WP:UNDUE. The view you are presenting might be added to articles if two conditions are met - one, that the source meets our criteria, and secondly if the idea has been discussed in other reliable sources (in this case archaeological sources) enough to be 'significant'. So far as I have been able to tell that hasn't happened. So I and other editors have removed your edits and I've been asked to explain why. I realise that this is disappointing but it is simply the way we work. I've given you a lot of other links you might want to read if you still want to contribute in other ways. Dougweller (talk) 19:16, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You are very clearly promoting your own work, once again I ask you to stop. Dougweller (talk) 20:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Your editing history appears to be blatantly self-promotional, which is why I set up a case at the WikiProject Spam  If I am wrong, you are free to justify your edits there.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

My error. There was no spam intended. I am still trying to figure out the wikipedia rules. I thought that the initial COI was for potentially self-published books and those of a profit making venture. I later only cited articles that were peer reviewed or with academic publishers. All changes were relevant to the articles. Changes to articles that I updated with other people's work were kept and those with mine were not. I understand now that an independent person (not the author) must make a citation for an article or book. My apologies and I am still pulling my hair out over this. Bernie Taylor


 * Thanks. Much appreciated. Dougweller (talk) 10:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)