User talk:Berposen

 Hello!

Spanish is my strong language, if you know and can speak it would be a better way to communicate with me, so you can go to my page in Spanish of Talk by clicking on this post.

 Posts

Give a click to leave a message in English.

 '''Become acquainted me first please, would be good. And trust me.'''

P.S: Maybe I do not speak the language well, I apologize for any mistake.



April 2022
Vladimir.copic (talk) 20:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

3RR violation on Azov Battalion
This revert, in addition to being a violation of the clear consensus established in this RFC, is also a WP:3RR violation (.) I suggest you self-revert. --Aquillion (talk) 21:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * No, it is normal to give people a warning and a chance to self-revert first. Someone else has already reverted you, so the point is largely moot, but do you concede that you violated the 3RR and shouldn't do so in the future? The important thing is mostly just to make sure that it doesn't happen again (and that you don't revert a fifth time, I guess.) If you believe that you didn't violate the 3RR and want me to take it there so an admin can decide, I suppose I could report it, but it mostly seems like a waste of everyone's time. --Aquillion (talk) 22:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Aquillion (talk) 22:16, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Azov Battalion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring
I note you are still at it. Slatersteven (talk) 12:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

And you are now at wp:3rr, and no an RFC is not decided until it is closed. Slatersteven (talk) 12:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 12:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Berposen, your recent edits are disruptive imo. I suggest you desist. Selfstudier (talk) 13:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Enough

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 13:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I have suggested that you may be running out of chances. You are continuing to revert at Azov Battalion after a one-week block for the same thing issued on April 8. Continued edit warring about the same thing usually does not lead to success on Wikipedia. (You might be indefinitely blocked). There may not be much time left for you to back away from this dispute. The complaint is still open at WP:AN3 if you want to respond there. EdJohnston (talk) 20:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)