User talk:BertBril

November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Scrum (development)‎, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Please add references and don't make grand, rambling commentary. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

There has to be a section like this one. We have to start somewhere. There is no reference there because that's exactly what I'm trying to add: the lack of proof. So I would expect you to either improve the text, or have it in. It is almost impossible to disagree about the topics I'm raising; only your opinion may be different. So step up, or accept. Doing otherwise would seem like pre-occupied action with a hidden agenda. BertBril (talk) 22:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to add to that: I'm a bit curious why you left out the 'positive' parts that I wrote. I think we all agree that SCRUM can be useful, for one. The problem with the page as it was before was: it was like text straight from a commercial white paper! That is not a good idea. I can hardly figure out where I saw what on god knows what sites I've visited. Hopefully others can step up and add citations: I can't remember to save my life. But do you disagree that a section like this is badly needed? I can see others having teh same opinion. Let's start now. BertBril (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I responded on the article's talk page. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:26, 4 November 2011 (UTC)