User talk:Berzha3

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, making personal threats. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 19:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

I am being abused by administrators that brandish their powers on innocent people that spend hours typing a hard earned article. The person especially is JoelWhy.
 * Articles can't be "earned": they are either on notable subjects or they are not. You threatened JoelWhy; that, besides your edit-warring to remove a speedy deletion tag, is enough reason for a block. None of the people who dealt with you, outside of me, are administrators, by the way: the editors (three or four of them) who dealt with your creation are regular editors who simply followed the rules. If you hadn't repeatedly removed those speedy deletion tags we could have had a normal conversation. On top of that, twice you recreated the article, leaving me no choice but to block you and to prevent anyone else, say,, from recreating it. Drmies (talk) 19:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

How were articles like InetSoft (the company Luke Liang is CEO of) created then? I spent a long time researching and putting together information. However, based on your response, I had threatened JoelWhy. Well I had never threatened JoelWhy, I had only insulted him. Is insulting someone not part of life? One that is insulted should not be a girl and hide behind someone else.

It was said that creating Luke Liang article was inappropriate. However, i have to beg to differ as nothing but information from websites was pulled out. Alas, I would have to give you my testimony that this awcamaro person is not me.


 * Insulting is indeed a part of life. It is still unacceptable here.  See WP:NPA.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free-for-all.   Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  20:10, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

As you say, insulting is unacceptable here, would you care to read what what posted before I insulted JoelWhy? I find a 2 v 1 outnumbering rather unjust as JoelWhy and another person came upon with their indirect insult. Did I ever mention anything about a free-for-all? I do not recall.

Reciting from your article you proposed: "Sometimes the best way to respond to an isolated personal attack is not to respond at all. Wikipedia and its debates can become stressful for some editors, who may occasionally overreact. Additionally, Wikipedia discussions are in a text-only medium that conveys nuances and emotions poorly; this can easily lead to misunderstanding. While personal attacks are not excused because of these factors, editors are encouraged to disregard angry and ill-mannered postings of others when it is reasonable to do so, and to continue to focus their efforts on improving and developing the encyclopedia."

Based on this testimony, It is supposed to be a personal attack. "you douches" is a rather broad statement and as it was never posted as a response to their comments, how can you insinuate it was a personal attack?


 * Enough. You have a choice. You figure out, calmly and rationally, why you got blocked (I'll summarize: disruption by repeatedly removing CSD tag, recreating deleted articles, threatening another editor), and how you might change that behavior. Also, read up on WP:N says about claiming notability for a subject and proving it. Then you can stick in an unblock request (explained in the blocking template, above). If you can't do that, if you have to continue to bicker (in sexist language, I might add), I will revoke your access to this talk page, since you are abusing it. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 20:24, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

"disruption by repeatedly removing CSD tag" - I had stopped that after JoelWhy gave me my warning for I was unknowledgeable of the subject before. I removed two of them because I had changed my citations to match the guidelines. Nonetheless I do not want to be unblocked, as I would have to experience a very bad environment again. There is no connotation to being sexist as the language I have used is common language within casual talk.

Question, who is the boss/bosses of Wikipedia?
 * There is no "boss" - basically, the Wikipedia community runs itself. There are several hundred administrators who have some extra powers, but have no special say about content; there is an elected Arbitration Committee who form a sort of final appeal court for really intractable disputes.


 * I have turned off the "helpme" - as you do not want to be unblocked, there is no need for further discussion here. If you change your mind, follow Drmies' advice just above. JohnCD (talk) 20:54, 25 May 2012 (UTC)