User talk:Bes1r123

Speedy deletion nomination of Pokdfg
Hello Bes1r123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pokdfg for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Eurodyne (talk) 23:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

46647864
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 46647864, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.rsssf.com/tablesb/bhutan2012.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pogdfg


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pogdfg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MadGuy7023 (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

484984849
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 484984849, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://textos-pre-textos-y-con-textos.blogspot.com/2006/09/esc-criptos-arund.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Pokdfg"
A page you created, Pokdfg, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 23:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 456466


A tag has been placed on 456466, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MadGuy7023 (talk) 23:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. MadGuy7023 (talk) 23:24, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 484984849
Hello Bes1r123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 484984849 for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dan Koehl (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 46647864
Hello Bes1r123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 46647864 for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dan Koehl (talk) 00:00, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Watch out
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Although I am glad to see a new member, I can see that you faced some deletion problems with your newly created articles. This is not uncommon for new editors, but you may  want to read the guidelines before creating an article. Thanks, William2001 (talk) 00:27, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for creating nonsense pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 00:31, 11 December 2014 (UTC)