User talk:Besnea

What happens now with my article "Entamoeba invadens: cell & developmental biology" (Title)" ?

September 2018
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Entamoeba invadens, from its old location at User:Besnea/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:49, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Entamoeba invadens (September 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Entamoeba invadens and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Entamoeba invadens, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Entamoeba_invadens Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Entamoeba_invadens reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

29 September 2018 from besnea@aol.com

Dear Robert McCleanon,

dear Wikipedia reviewer,

thank you for the message. You write: ..... ''the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Entamoeba invadens instead,'' and further: ''We already have an article on this pathogenic unicellular eukaryote. Please compare this draft with the existing article and update the article as appropriate''

That's wright, but the article you're meaning is a outdated school-parasitological review that merely describes ancient morphological and biochemical aspects, out of references to current cell biology and regulatory genetics / epigenetics. An improvement of this skinny parasitological article is hardly and antithetical, there are too many statements that do not fit together.

I must point out that recent studies advance E. invadens to a subject of modern cell biology. It could be shown that stemness was already developed by the common eukaryotic ancestor and not by metazoans, as thought until recently. The same applies to symmetric and asymmetric cell divisions, cyclic differentiation, oxygen control and much more.

E. invadens has become an pivotal orientation cell model for cancer research (see my four articles in the Romanian Wikipedia). I also planned to write a similar article about the recent life cycle theory in cancer for the English Wikipedia. However, this would not be possible without writing on the present reference article on modern cell biological knowledge in E. invadens.

It would be a pity if international readership and cancer communities would have to turn to the Romanian and not to the English Wikipedia and seek the Google Translator for helping. Best regards Vladimir F. Niculescu

Cell biologist

Germany

29. September 2018, 12:57

Dear Robert,

Another possibilty would be the reformation of the article "Entamoeba" which is similarly chaotic. If you give me the permission to restructure it, I could introduce my own article into the chapter "Differentiation and cell biology". The resultIt would be precisely a well structured and well documented article. But it's a lot of work and I want you to get your approval in advance.

best regards Vladimir