User talk:BestMind1

Speedy deletion of Youpop.com
A tag has been placed on Youpop.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Youpop.com
A tag has been placed on Youpop.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Gwernol 03:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Use of the Hangon tag
I saw the hangon template on this page, and I wanted to help. You seem to have misunderstood the use of the hangon template. To contest a proposed speedy deletion you add hangon to the page in question (the page that an editor has tagged for speedy deletion), just below the speedy delete tag (which usually has a name that starts with db (for "delete because")). You do not add it to your user talk page below the message informing you that a page has been tagged for speedy deletion, because then people looking at the page tagged for speedy deletion won't see it.

If a page has been deleted before you see the message, or in spite of your use of hangon, you can send a message to the deleting admin on his or her user talk page. If you click on a link to a deleted page you will see the relevant deletion log entries, which will show you the user ID of the admin who did the deletion. Vivio Testa rossa  Talk Who 03:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

hi i believe i was providing valuable insights into q&a websites that offer video rather than text as the main polling feature. example listen to mccain vs obama than vote etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BestMind1 (talk • contribs)


 * Hi. Please read our guidelines on notability for articles about websites. In particular there is a list of criteria that your article has to meet at least one of the following:
 * The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.
 * The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization.
 * The content is distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster
 * Your article did not show how Youpop.com met any of these. You will need to find published, independent sources that you can include in the article to show how Youpop meets one of these criteria. Thanks, Gwernol 04:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)