User talk:BestTanmayEver

Welcome!
Hello, BestTanmayEver, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chital Mehta, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! The Wicked Twisted Road (talk) 03:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Chital Mehta


The article Chital Mehta has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The Wicked Twisted Road (talk) 03:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

I've been try to talk to someone at the help desk! But I've got no reply!! Maybe you could tell me what exactly is wrong with my page!! PLEASE! BestTanmayEver (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

I just read your message carefully AGAIN! I haven't provided enough sources? Well, there's one named "GRD college" and "gujarati" and "tiruppur" ...they seem like pretty good sources to me! BestTanmayEver (talk) 17:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC) BestTanmayEver (talk) 17:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Anyone there? I just created a page named CHITAL MEHTA! something's wrong! I can't really figure it our! Could you please help me? BestTanmayEver (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Am I literally just talking to myself? Or is somebody gonna show up? BestTanmayEver (talk) 17:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC) BestTanmayEver (talk) 17:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry no-one has responded yet. I don't think that article is going to be suitable for Wikipedia because I don't think it passes WP:AUTHOR. The way to save it would be to find reliable sources which talk about that author in depth.


 * It seems this help me system might not be monitored much, but I'm sure you will get a response at the WP:HELP DESK Siuenti (talk) 17:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * the help me requests are monitored but like everything else on Wikipedia, it's done by volunteers, so it may take time to address an issue. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:33, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Please do not keep posting templates - someone will take a look as soon as they can. Wikipedia is run by volunteers and there are many users so it may take a few minutes or several hours to get to a help me request. As far as your article goes, it is being proposed for deletion as it has no sources. If you read through the proposed deletion template on the page, you will find several links that will guide you through what types of sources are required for Wikipedia articles. Please do not remove this template or notice until you have added reliable sources.  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

I am so sorry to have used this "help me" thing again! But I just went to "wikipedia:sources" and that page said that I must have references to works of an author in the author's page. So should I now create pages for the author's novels?? BestTanmayEver (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You do not need to continue using the help-me feature for this - you can just respond to me by placing in your response. You do not need to create articles for her novels - you need to use references and inline citations in your existing article that support claims in the article. You also need to establish notability.  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I've moved your article into draft space (Draft:Chital Mehta) so you can continue to work on it without running the risk of more immediate deletion. Once you are ready to submit it for review, please follow the instructions on the template at the top of the page. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Here are some more comments, which I hope may be helpful to you.


 * At present, you need to concentrate on providing sources to show the notability of the author. If and when you have done that you can consider whether creating articles about her individual novels is suitable, but I think it is very unlikely that they will be notable enough to be the subjects of articles if she isn't. You have said that there are sources about her, but you haven't said what or where they are, so nobody else can read them and see for himself or herself what they say. Can you tell us exactly what these sources are? If they are internet sources give links to them; if they are books or other paper sources then give titles, authors' names, publishers, etc. You say that she is "a noted public figure": if she is, then there must be significant sources about her, because she wouldn't be "noted" if numerous people hadn't written significant content about her. Can you tell us who has written about her, and where?


 * You are clearly having difficulty understanding how sourcing works, and finding it frustrating trying to get help. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start.


 * On the subject of use of "help me" tags, Chrissymad is quite right to ask you not to keep posting new ones while you have one already open, as it serves no useful purpose at all: editors who check the list of current help requests see just one link to this page whether you have got one help me tag or six of them, so your request won't be answered any quicker because you keep posting more and more of them. In fact, the only thing that having several help requests open at the same time is to create extra work for the editor who eventually responds to them, as he or she has to close all of them, instead of just one. However, I don't agree that you shouldn't post a new one if you have a new request for help after the old one has been answered, because a new "help me" may bring another editor who may be able to give different advice, whereas posting will not attract help from anyone other than the named editor. For example, if this time you had used  instead of, I would not have seen it and posted this advice. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I should've clarified I meant in their response to me - not for general help. Thank you for explaining it a bit more! CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Chital Mehta concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Chital Mehta, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chital Mehta


Hello, BestTanmayEver. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chital Mehta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  T K K ! bark with me! 15:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)