User talk:Bethakneedeep/sandbox

I realize that I copy / pasted the entire article, however, I had to make changes to every single paragraph, and believe that this is an acceptable situation to have done it this way -Bethakneedeep (talk) 01:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Peer review of article Bottom feeder by user Cass-stock

Lead: Gives a good introduction to the topic. Could be useful to add information from the subsequent sections such as different feeding strategies that bottom feeders use and their importance to aquariums.

Structure: The sections are well organized in a sensible order.

Balance: All information provided is relevant.I would suggest combining the feeding strategies section with the behavior section as the behaviors talked about are different strategies of obtaining prey. Adding content surrounding where bottom feeders may be found or behaviors performed other than feeding may be beneficial.

Neutrality of Content: All content provided is presented in a neutral manner.

Sources: All statements in the article are connected to a reliable source. There are also a variety of different sources used to show all viewpoints.

Additional Notes: Good use of links. Photos of the different body physiology types mentioned could further demonstrate the differences. Overall good contribution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cass-stock (talk • contribs) 16:06, 29 October 2019 (UTC)