User talk:Bethpage89

Heeeey bro ., How r u ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VVAlQubaisiVv (talk • contribs) 21:36, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello Bethpage89, and and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your comment about the photo caption on the Doolittle Raid. I corrected the caption. You can make those changes yourself, or if there is a comment/correction you propose, those should be done on the article's talk page.

I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Drop us a note at New user log so we can meet you and help you get started. In the meantime, here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style (formatting questions)

If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, add a question to the Village pump, ask me on my talk page, or place   on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. (A note on process: Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date.)

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! &mdash;ERcheck @ 21:57, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Conspiracies
Hi. Please stop changing "co-conspirators" to "conspirators". When people are in a conspiracy together, they are co-conspirators. To write "his conspirators", implies that he owns or controls them, rather than being one of them. Another good example is with the term "co-presidents". When somone shares responsibility with others, you can write "he and his co-presidents..." but if you write "he and his presidents", it implies either that he's a voter or subject, or that he controls and owns the presidents, not that he is one of them. Thank you. LordAmeth 16:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Turboprop
This is the correct term, and the title for the related article. Please don't change links away from the actual article to a redirect page. Thanks. Akradecki 14:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Fizeau interferometer
Hi, I checked out the link that you added pointing to the Yahoo interferometry group. It's certainly an interesting and active group, but the group is mostly devoted to the use of interferometers in amateur telescope making, and the great majority of posts deal with the Bath Interferometer, so I removed your reference to the group. We don't have an article on that interferometer, but undoubtedly we should. The Yahoo group should be a valuable resource to use in creating an article on this form of interferometer. Thanks! Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 15:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

(?)
Hi! If you think something needs references, it's better to use cn instead of '(?)'. Richard 10:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)