User talk:Betino

Renderosity:
It is extreamly difficult to find secondary references. Even in Nashville's newspapers I could not find anything so far. This maybe a result of Computer Graphics not being considered as recognized art, yet.

MMOG:
References will follow.
 * Regrettably, that's not the way it works. The references need to accompany your the edits.  Tide  rolls  18:26, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

MMOG
Hi, Betino. This article is tagged as being in need of citations for its content. Adding further unsourced content does nothing to reinforce the confidence in our content that our readers derserve. Verifiability is a Wikipedia policy and you can learn more about supporting your edits at WP:Identifying reliable sources. Regards  Tide  rolls  22:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

MMOG:
Contents + References added. MMOG 18Feb2013 7pm 93.196.243.227:: by Betino
 * (+30)‎ . . ((minor edit) : →Money Spending: renamed, Wireplay: untagged missing link)
 * (+3,238)‎ . . (→See also → External Links →Committed Time and Addiction + references)

error in ref-links:
" World of Warcraft is currently a dominant MMOG in the world with more than 60% of the subscribing player base,''' and with 11–12 million monthly subscribers worldwide,

''' is the most popular Western title among MMOGs. In 2008, Western consumer spending on

World of Warcraft represented a 58% share of the subscription MMOG market. The title has generated over $2.2 billion in cumulative consumer spending on subscriptions since 2005.

<ref name=Harding-Rolls 2010"

More at MMOG
When an editor reverts one of your edits the next step you take is discussion of the differences on the article talk page. To simply revert to your version, as you did here, is an opening step to edit warring (please see WP:Edit warring). The general philosophy that is followed by convention is found at WP:Bold, revert, discuss.  Tide  rolls  22:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Renderosity for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renderosity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Renderosity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GDallimore (Talk) 16:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)