User talk:BetoLuckNextTime

September 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Boy Scouts of America membership controversies has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Boy Scouts of America membership controversies was changed by BetoLuckNextTime (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856246 on 2019-09-14T06:22:59+00:00
 * Your edits to Boy Scouts of America membership controversies are not in accordance with wikipedia policies. If you continue to make these edits you will be blocked from editing wikipedia. As a new editor, please learn the ropes by making non-controversial edits. --Bduke (talk) 06:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

no
You do not live in the United States and ALL of the information you are constantly providing is fake information that has been proven time and time again to be false. You made a fake wikipedia page with false information to push a false agenda. There isn't a single thing in that page that is correct. You wanting to bar me from correcting lies and using bots to undo the removal of falsified information proves that you are bias. You do not know what you are talking about. I will continue to delete you fake information as I please. Kindly go fuck a kangaroo and piss off you nazi trash. BetoLuckNextTime (talk) 07:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

They are all material that has proper references and has been in Wikipedia for some time. I have blocked you from editing wikipedia. Please spend the time of you block thinking about the references and Wikipedia policies. The fact that I live in Australia has nothing to do with anything. --Bduke (talk) 07:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

References don't mean truth.
just because it has a reference does not mean it is factual. Much of the info is based solely on and opinion column written by a paid protestor and now unemployed writer who faced backlash for creating false stories to get front page coverage. you are defending false information based on bias falsified information created by someone who lost a lawsuit against the BSA. There are articles that say hitler is still alive and they have references. Does it make the article true? No it doesn't BetoLuckNextTime (talk) 07:25, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * BetoLuckNextTime, what you are saying is unfounded, vague, and intellectually dishonest. If you come off this block, it would be a good idea to not pick this up again in the same manner. Drmies (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Never mind--I just saw this, "Kindly go fuck a kangaroo and piss off you nazi trash". Goodbye. Drmies (talk) 17:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 17:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

The info Bduke is adding to the BSA page is opinion articles and satire. He believes that ANY source proves fact even when the source is The Onion or The National Enquirer. His argument is unsound and the information within the page is based solely on a story written by the person who filed a lawsuit against the BSA and lost. Keeping fake pages on wikipedia shows you do not care for truth or accuracy but for tabloidial farces. BetoLuckNextTime (talk) 20:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

You don't want people to correct false information. You say my request doesn't argue the reason for the block to begine with. Bduke has authored 30 hate filled wikipedia articles and has blocked anyone who tries to correct them. He also states that hitler and the Nazi party are Republicans and that is 100% false information. He is using bias and his own political views as reason to lock out articles. You blocked me for correcting false info and deleting a made up page. That is the basis of the blocking. Bduke doesn't want the page corrected to state facts he wants it to invoke hate towards an organization and a political party. You are supporting someone who on thousands of occasions has blocked people for undoing his corrections that do not represent truth. You say I am malicious to delete a false document and you defend a politically bias article written by your own staff. That in itself proves that wikipedia does not represent learning or truth but stands for communism and hate. BetoLuckNextTime (talk) 20:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You were blocked for deleting large blocks of well-sourced content without any attempts at discussing particular issues with the content. That's not how Wikipedia works; we you don't get to waltz in and en-masse delete things you don't like. If you're going to accuse people of having biased views, you'll need to provide diffs to support your accusations. I suggest you take the time to read the guide to appealing blocks; if you make further unblock requests that are about other people and not about your actions, you will lose the ability to edit your talk page and make further unblock requests here. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 20:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

You say I must prove he is bias and that people can't add or delete without showing proof but Bduke can add and delete "en-mass" whatever he wants without sources and even a single look into his alterations shows he only monitors certain pages. If he can write hate filled articles without repercussions and anyone trying to stop him is banned then it shows you don not take things seriously. You run to the defense of a bias employee that shows utter hate for the United States and edits pages to speak poorly on a specific nation. You don't care what he writes as he is an employee but anyone that tries to correct him is treated as a terrorist and you demand they be silenced. BetoLuckNextTime (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * As promised, talk page access revoked. If your unblock request is declined, this leaves you with WP:UTRS. Be warned, if your unblock requests there are similar to your ones here, you'll lose that final avenue. --Yamla (talk) 21:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note also that I think you are deeply confused about Bduke being an employee. Like me, he's an administrator. But unless I'm very much mistaken, he is also, like me, just a volunteer here. Not an employee. --Yamla (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2019 (UTC)