User talk:BetterWorld100

February 2018
Your recent editing history at Billy Meier shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dorsetonian (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Billy Meier. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. LuckyLouie (talk) 18:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Please read our policy: Synthesis of published material that advances a position. By combining a claimed Meier prophecy with an article you found in New Scientist to come to a conclusion that neither source has stated, you're violating our No Original Research policy. If you continue to edit war, you will be blocked from editing. - LuckyLouie (talk) 18:57, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Billy Meier has been reverted. Your edit here to Billy Meier was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoZO6CAXxsI) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Meier, you may be blocked from editing. ''Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for promotion. Please see WP:NOT for more info.'' JimRenge (talk) 10:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Copied from my talk page to keep the discussion in one place. JimRenge (talk) 12:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Billy Meier Page
Do explain how my edits to the Billy Meier page are disruptive. Also, do explain how any posted information was false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BetterWorld100 (talk • contribs) 10:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a place for advertising, marketing or public relations. Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources. (See also WP:BURDEN) Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's | policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. If you have more questions about wikipedia, please consider to visit the WP:TEAHOUSE. Thank you JimRenge (talk) 12:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)